Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Sentry 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UptimeRobot
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Free
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,267)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSentry
Star Rating
(123)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Sentry, while also strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.0, indicating it may not integrate as broadly as GitHub.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Task Management feature, rated at 8.9, provides a robust platform for organizing and tracking project tasks, making it a favorite among teams. Sentry's Task Management, rated at 8.0, does not offer the same level of functionality, which may hinder project organization.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Documentation quality, scoring 8.7, as a significant advantage, providing clear guidance and resources for users. In comparison, Sentry's documentation, while helpful, is rated lower at 8.2, which some users find less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 report that Sentry shines in Real-Time Monitoring, achieving a score of 9.3, which is crucial for developers needing immediate feedback on application performance. GitHub, while strong in many areas, does not focus as heavily on this aspect, scoring lower in performance monitoring.
- Reviewers mention that Sentry's Crash Monitoring capabilities, rated at 9.0, provide timely alerts and detailed reports, making it a preferred choice for teams focused on maintaining application stability. GitHub, while offering some monitoring features, does not specialize in crash reporting to the same extent.
- Users say that GitHub's Ease of Use is a standout feature, with a score of 8.7, making it accessible for users of all skill levels. Sentry, with a score of 8.6, is also user-friendly but may present a steeper learning curve for some features, according to user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Sentry
Developer
Free
For solo devs working on small projects
- 5k events/month
- 1 user
- 30 day history
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Sentry
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,964
9.0
101
Ease of Use
8.7
1,980
8.7
104
Ease of Setup
9.0
591
8.6
54
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
8.8
35
Quality of Support
8.8
1,571
8.5
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
8.9
28
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,916
9.2
102
Features by Category
User Behavior
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
A/B Testing
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visitor Information
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Agentic AI - Session Replay
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Agentic AI - Website Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
7.5
36
8.9
188
7.4
35
9.0
192
8.0
40
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
8.7
41
8.9
196
8.9
45
9.0
184
8.2
41
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
Crash Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.4
11
Crash Data
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Visibility
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
14
Agentic AI - Log Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
6.9
16
Not enough data
8.5
19
Response
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.1
19
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
18
Not enough data
7.7
17
Functionality
Not enough data
7.3
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
5.5
13
Not enough data
6.8
14
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Sentry are categorized as Gaming Tools and Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sentry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Computer Software
29.8%
Information Technology and Services
19.0%
Internet
9.1%
Financial Services
4.1%
Logistics and Supply Chain
3.3%
Other
34.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
Sentry has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
