Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Semaphore 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Contact Us 0 -
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSemaphore
Star Rating
(191)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 0 -
Learn more about SemaphoreSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, with many reviewers mentioning the seamless connection with various third-party tools, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for extensive integration options.
- Reviewers mention that Semaphore shines in Quality of Support, achieving a score of 9.6. Users appreciate the responsive customer service and detailed documentation, which they find helpful for troubleshooting and onboarding.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Deployment Automation features, scoring 8.9, as a strong point, with many noting the ease of setting up CI/CD pipelines, which enhances their development workflow.
- Users on G2 report that Semaphore's Test Customization capabilities, scoring 9.2, allow for a high degree of flexibility in testing processes, which is particularly beneficial for teams with unique testing requirements.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's Access Control features, with a score of 9.1, provide robust security options, allowing teams to manage permissions effectively, which is crucial for collaborative projects.
- Users report that Semaphore's Automation features, scoring 9.1, are highly praised for their efficiency, with many users mentioning that the platform significantly reduces manual intervention in deployment processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Semaphore
Optimize Your CI/CD Pipeline with Personalized Onboarding
Contact Us
0 -
- Get onboarded on Semaphore by our CI/CD experts with 10yrs+ experience.
- Speed up your CI/CD pipeline by 20-30%.
- Reduce 50% in your CI/CD costs.
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Semaphore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
9.1
164
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
9.1
166
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
9.0
83
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
9.1
75
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
9.6
150
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
9.6
71
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
9.0
161
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
9.3
38
9.2
241
9.2
38
8.9
238
8.7
37
Management
9.0
236
9.2
41
8.5
231
8.2
38
9.0
239
9.1
41
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
8.4
15
9.2
136
7.9
14
8.6
133
8.8
13
Functionality
8.8
134
9.2
15
8.9
136
8.8
14
8.7
134
8.8
14
Processes
8.9
136
9.1
15
8.8
134
8.9
15
9.1
138
8.8
13
Functionality
9.3
223
8.9
44
|
Verified
9.0
212
8.7
41
|
Verified
8.7
204
9.0
42
|
Verified
Management
8.9
217
9.4
44
|
Verified
8.9
213
9.4
44
|
Verified
8.3
208
8.2
39
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
33
Not enough data
9.2
34
Not enough data
8.7
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
Automation
Not enough data
8.7
32
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.1
32
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Semaphore are categorized as DevOps Platforms, Continuous Delivery, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Semaphore is categorized as Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Semaphore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Software
34.8%
Information Technology and Services
14.7%
Internet
8.2%
Financial Services
4.9%
Logistics and Supply Chain
2.2%
Other
35.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Semaphore has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
