Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Review Board 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,270)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansReview Board
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Review BoardSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its integration capabilities, with a G2 rating of 9.2 for integrations, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to connect with various tools seamlessly. In contrast, Review Board, while still strong, has a slightly lower rating of 8.8 for integrations, which may limit some users' workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Review Board shines in its ease of setup, boasting a G2 score of 9.7, which is higher than GitHub's 9.0. This makes Review Board a favorable option for teams that prioritize quick deployment and minimal configuration time.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's robust access control features, scoring 9.0, which allows for fine-grained permissions and security settings. Review Board also performs well in this area with a score of 9.1, but users note that GitHub's interface for managing these settings is more intuitive.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's task management features, rated at 8.9, provide a comprehensive solution for tracking issues and managing projects. Review Board, while effective, received a lower score of 8.8, indicating that GitHub may offer a more integrated experience for project management.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's deployment automation features are rated at 8.9, which helps streamline the release process. In comparison, Review Board's deployment automation score of 8.5 suggests that while it offers automation, it may not be as comprehensive as GitHub's capabilities.
- Users say that GitHub's overall product direction is rated positively at 8.9, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. Review Board, with a score of 7.9, may not inspire the same level of confidence in its future development, which could be a consideration for long-term users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Review Board
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Review Board
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,965
9.2
13
Ease of Use
8.7
1,981
8.5
13
Ease of Setup
9.0
592
9.4
6
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
1,572
8.3
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,917
8.1
12
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
237
Not enough data
8.4
232
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
214
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Review Board are categorized as Peer Code Review
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Review Board has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Review Board
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Software
56.3%
Internet
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Legal Services
6.3%
Other
6.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Review Board has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
