# GitHub vs Review Board Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that GitHub excels in providing a comprehensive platform that integrates version control, collaboration, and automation. Users appreciate the structured pull request workflow, which enhances transparency and teamwork during code reviews, making it a favorite among developers.
- **Users say** Review Board offers a straightforward interface that simplifies the code review process, especially for teams with new members. The clear feedback mechanism helps both authors and reviewers understand changes easily, fostering effective collaboration.
- **Reviewers mention** that GitHub's seamless integration with modern CI/CD ecosystems, like Vercel, significantly enhances the development experience. This capability allows developers to manage and track their projects smoothly, which is particularly beneficial for those working with frameworks like React and TypeScript.
- **According to verified reviews** , while Review Board is praised for its fair feedback system, it lacks the extensive feature set that GitHub provides. Users note that GitHub's version control and issue tracking features are particularly helpful in managing coding projects without the hassle of duplicate folders.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that GitHub's high satisfaction ratings reflect its ability to meet user needs effectively, with a strong emphasis on quality support and product direction. In contrast, Review Board's lower scores suggest it may not fully align with the evolving demands of its users.
- **Users express** that GitHub's ease of use and setup are significant advantages, with many finding the onboarding process intuitive. This contrasts with Review Board, where some users feel that while it is easy to use, it may not offer the same level of support and resources for more complex workflows.



| | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.7 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 2,366 | 16 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (45.4% of reviews) | Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | $0.00 1 users | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### GitHub

Pros:
- Features (124 reviews)
- Ease of Use (111 reviews)

Cons:
- Complexity (47 reviews)
- Learning Curve (45 reviews)

### Review Board

Pros:
- Review System (4 reviews)
- Code Review (3 reviews)

Cons:
- UX Improvement (5 reviews)
- Difficult Usability (1 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 9.3 (2043 reviews) | 9.2 (13 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 8.7 (2065 reviews) | 8.5 (13 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 9.0 (676 reviews) | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.7 (457 reviews) | Not enough data | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.7 (1634 reviews) | 8.3 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.9 (393 reviews) | Not enough data | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.9 (1985 reviews) | 8.1 (12 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### GitHub

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free for Individuals and Organizations

Price: $0.00 1 users

Description: Basics for teams and developers

Key Features:
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month  (Free for public repositories)

[Browse all 3 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/github/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

### Review Board

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Application Release Orchestration

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.7/10 | 180 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Administration

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Configuration Management** | 8.9 (143 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Access Control** | 9.1 (151 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Dashboards** | 8.6 (142 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Functionality

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Deployment Automation** | 8.9 (145 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Process Analytics** | 8.5 (127 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Plugins** | 8.8 (132 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **APIs / Integrations** | 9.0 (147 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Feature Flags** | 8.2 (128 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Processes

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Pipelines** | 9.0 (144 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Orchestration** | 8.7 (138 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Visualization** | 8.6 (140 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.6/10 | 67 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Administration

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **API / Integrations** | 9.0 (41 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Extensibility** | 8.8 (38 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Analysis

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting and Analytics** | 8.3 (40 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Tracking** | 8.7 (44 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Static Code Analysis** | 8.6 (41 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Code Analysis** | 8.9 (47 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Testing

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Command-Line Tools** | 9.0 (42 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Manual Testing** | 8.3 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Test Automation** | 8.4 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Testing** | 8.5 (33 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Black-Box Scanning** | 8.3 (32 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Detection Rate** | 8.6 (34 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **False Positives** | 8.0 (32 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Cloud Infrastructure Automation

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.8/10 | 122 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Administration 

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Administration Console** | 9.0 (91 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | 8.9 (91 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Dashboards and Visualizations** | 8.6 (91 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Access Control** | 9.1 (97 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Automation

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Automation** | 8.8 (90 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Intelligent Automation** | 8.6 (83 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Release Automation** | 8.7 (91 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Automated Provisioning** | 8.8 (83 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### IT Management

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Workflow Management** | 8.9 (94 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Infrastructure Management** | 8.8 (84 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **IT Discovery** | 8.7 (79 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Continuous Delivery

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.8/10 | 307 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Deployment-Ready Staging** | 9.1 (249 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Integration** | 9.2 (259 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Extensible** | 8.8 (232 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Management

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Processes and Workflow** | 9.1 (246 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting** | 8.4 (229 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Automation** | 9.0 (252 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | 9.1 (26 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | 8.8 (24 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | 8.6 (21 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | 8.6 (23 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | 8.8 (23 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Bug Tracking

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.8/10 | 237 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Bug Reporting

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **User Reports & Feedback** | 8.9 (192 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Tester Reports & Feedback** | 8.8 (185 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Team Reports & Comments** | 9.0 (190 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Bug Monitoring

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Analytics** | 8.4 (183 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Bug History** | 8.9 (203 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Data Retention** | 9.0 (178 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Bug Tracking

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Adaptive Learning** | 9.1 (20 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | 9.0 (20 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | 8.7 (19 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Software Composition Analysis

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.8/10 | 92 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality - Software Composition Analysis 

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Language Support** | 8.8 (65 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Integration** | 9.0 (70 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Transparency** | 9.1 (70 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Remediation Suggestions** | 8.7 (67 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Continuous Monitoring** | 9.0 (70 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Thorough Detection** | 8.8 (69 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### DevOps Platforms

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.9/10 | 195 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Management

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Configuration Management** | 8.9 (138 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Access Control** | 9.1 (149 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Orchestration** | 8.6 (131 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Functionality

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automation** | 8.9 (148 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Integrations** | 8.9 (141 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Extensibility** | 8.6 (127 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Processes

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Pipeline Control** | 8.9 (139 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Visualization** | 8.8 (130 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Continuous Deployment** | 9.1 (149 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Continuous Integration

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.5/10 | 268 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Integrations** | 9.3 (228 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Extensibility** | 8.9 (210 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Test Customization** | 8.6 (202 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Management

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automation** | 8.9 (222 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Processes and Workflow** | 8.9 (217 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting** | 8.3 (205 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Continuous Integration

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | 8.3 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | 8.8 (30 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | 8.5 (24 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | 7.7 (27 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | 8.3 (26 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Secure Code Review

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub** | 8.6/10 | 216 |
| **Review Board** | N/A | N/A |

#### Documentation

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Feedback** | 8.7 (181 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | 8.7 (170 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Remediation Suggestions** | 8.6 (164 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Security

| Feature | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **False Positives** | 8.2 (159 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Custom Compliance** | 8.5 (161 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Agility** | 9.0 (173 reviews) | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Peer Code Review Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/peer-code-review)

**Unique to GitHub (13):** [DevOps Platforms](https://www.g2.com/categories/devops-platforms), [Software Composition Analysis Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-composition-analysis), [Cloud Infrastructure Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-infrastructure-automation), [Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/static-application-security-testing-sast), [Application Release Orchestration (ARO) Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/application-release-orchestration), [Version Control Hosting Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-hosting), [Continuous Delivery Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-delivery-tools), [Gaming Tools ](https://www.g2.com/categories/gaming-tools), [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/bug-tracking), [Configuration Management Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/configuration-management), [Continuous Integration Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-integration), [Build Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/build-automation), [Secure Code Review Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/secure-code-review)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | GitHub | Review Board | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 45.4% | 0% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 30.7% | 50.0% | 
| **Enterprise** | 23.9% | 50.0% | 

### By Industry

#### GitHub

- **Computer Software:** 32.3%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 22.5%
- **Internet:** 6.5%
- **Financial Services:** 3.2%
- **Higher Education:** 3.2%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 2.5%
- **Education Management:** 2.1%
- **Program Development:** 1.7%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 1.6%
- **Research:** 1.3%
- **Other:** 23.0%

#### Review Board

- **Computer Software:** 56.3%
- **Internet:** 12.5%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 12.5%
- **Telecommunications:** 6.3%
- **Legal Services:** 6.3%
- **Consumer Electronics:** 6.3%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to GitHub

- [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (896 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (377 reviews)
- [Jenkins](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (567 reviews)
- [CircleCI](https://www.g2.com/products/circleci/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (509 reviews)
- [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (622 reviews)
- [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews)
- [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (1012 reviews)
- [Copado DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/copado-devops/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (329 reviews)
- [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (292 reviews)

### Alternatives to Review Board

- [Gerrit](https://www.g2.com/products/gerrit/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (32 reviews)
- [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (896 reviews)
- [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (1012 reviews)
- [Phabricator](https://www.g2.com/products/phabricator/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (27 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews)
- [Collaborator](https://www.g2.com/products/collaborator/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (12 reviews)
- [Crucible](https://www.g2.com/products/crucible/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (28 reviews)
- [Sentry](https://www.g2.com/products/sentry/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (213 reviews)
- [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews)
- [Assembla](https://www.g2.com/products/assembla/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (138 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### GitHub

- Title: [What is GitHub used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-github-used-for) — 8 comments, 4 upvotes
  > **Top comment:** "- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project management"
- Title: [What can GitHub be used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-can-github-be-used-for) — 5 comments
  > **Top comment:** "To have a storage for my main projects."
- Title: [How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-is-github-shaping-the-landscape-of-collaborative-software-development-and-version-control) — 4 comments
  > **Top comment:** "GitHub provides a platform for developers across the world to collaborate on projects, regardless of their location. It has become a vital tool for..."
- Title: [What does GitHub mean?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-does-github-mean) — 2 comments
  > **Top comment:** "pandora of Codes, 
All useful codes developed by coders around the globe are here."
- Title: [How can we make git merge easier to avoid conflicts](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-we-make-git-merge-easier-to-avoid-conflicts) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Rebase the brach you want to merge with the branch you are merging into berforehand "

### Review Board

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/github-vs-review-board)