Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GitHub and Progress Telerik Fiddler

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Star Rating
(166)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 community license
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Progress Telerik Fiddler, while also strong with a score of 9.2, is noted for its Extensibility features, enabling users to customize their testing environment extensively.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use rating of 8.7 is a significant advantage for teams looking for a user-friendly interface, while Progress Telerik Fiddler's score of 8.1 indicates a steeper learning curve, which some users find challenging when starting out.
  • G2 users highlight GitHub's Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, noting that the community and documentation provide excellent resources for troubleshooting. Conversely, users on G2 report that Progress Telerik Fiddler's support, rated at 7.9, could improve, particularly in response times for technical queries.
  • Reviewers say that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature, rated at 9.0, significantly streamlines the process of preparing code for production, making it a favorite among developers. In comparison, Progress Telerik Fiddler's Deployment Automation score of 8.9 is commendable but does not match the same level of user satisfaction.
  • Users report that GitHub's Task Management feature, with a score of 8.9, is highly effective for organizing and tracking project tasks, which is crucial for team collaboration. On the other hand, Progress Telerik Fiddler's Processes and Workflow score of 9.0 indicates strong capabilities in managing workflows, but some users feel it lacks the intuitive task management features found in GitHub.
  • Users on G2 mention that GitHub's Access Control feature, rated at 9.0, provides robust security and permissions management, which is essential for teams handling sensitive projects. In contrast, Progress Telerik Fiddler's score of 9.1 in the same category shows it also offers strong access control, but users feel GitHub's implementation is more straightforward and easier to navigate.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Fiddler Classic
Free
1 community license
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
8.8
145
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
8.1
144
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
8.9
29
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
8.5
28
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
7.9
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
8.9
25
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
8.0
141
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.7
157
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.6
53
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.8
108
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
8.8
258
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
8.8
210
8.3
25
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
8.4
22
8.9
188
8.3
20
9.0
192
8.2
19
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
8.6
18
8.9
196
8.3
19
9.0
184
7.9
19
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.8
84
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
8.8
149
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.5
236
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.6
201
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub
GitHub
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler
GitHub and Progress Telerik Fiddler are categorized as Bug Tracking
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.0%
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
33.3%
Reviewers' Industry
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Computer Software
30.2%
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Program Development
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.1%
Other
35.8%
Alternatives
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler Alternatives
Charles Proxy
Charles Proxy
Add Charles Proxy
Jira
Jira
Add Jira
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Wrike
Wrike
Add Wrike
Discussions
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
Jagadeesh V.
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Progress Telerik Fiddler Discussions
What is Progress Telerik Fiddler used for?
1 Comment
Prashant K.
PK
Network MonitoringRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Progress Telerik Fiddler has no more discussions with answers