Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Phabricator 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,265)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansPhabricator
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhabricatorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to get started quickly. In contrast, Phabricator's setup score is significantly lower at 6.3, which some reviewers mention can lead to a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's integration capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, and users appreciate the seamless connections with various third-party tools. Phabricator, while also strong in integrations with a score of 9.0, is noted by users to have fewer out-of-the-box options compared to GitHub.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior task management features, scoring 8.9, which allows for better organization and tracking of projects. In contrast, Phabricator's task management score of 8.8 is seen as effective but not as user-friendly, according to some reviewers.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's quality of support is rated at 8.7, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Phabricator's support, while decent at 8.1, is mentioned by some users as being less accessible, leading to longer resolution times.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's extensibility is rated at 8.8, allowing users to customize their workflows effectively. Phabricator also scores well in this area at 8.9, but some users feel that GitHub's community-driven plugins provide a wider range of options.
- Users say that GitHub's reporting and analytics features are rated at 8.2, which some find lacking in depth compared to Phabricator's score of 8.4. However, reviewers note that GitHub's simplicity in reporting is beneficial for teams that prefer straightforward insights.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Phabricator
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Phabricator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
8.5
27
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
8.4
27
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
6.3
15
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
8.2
14
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
8.1
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
8.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
8.7
27
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Phabricator are categorized as Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Bug Tracking, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
Phabricator has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Phabricator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Internet
18.5%
Retail
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Phabricator has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
