Compare GitHub and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,309)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, with users praising its straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple contributors are involved. This makes it a top choice for teams looking to enhance their coding collaboration.
- Users say that OpenText Static Application Security Testing offers robust support for a wide range of programming languages, which is a significant advantage for organizations with diverse tech stacks. Reviewers appreciate its ability to generate FPR files from CI/CD pipelines, enhancing integration into existing workflows.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's overall user satisfaction is notably high, reflected in its strong G2 Score. Many users highlight the platform's effectiveness in managing software projects and its importance in the job market, where showcasing a GitHub profile can be crucial.
- According to verified reviews, OpenText Static Application Security Testing is recognized for its extensive integration capabilities with third-party tools, which can be a game-changer for enterprises looking to streamline their security processes across various platforms.
- G2 reviewers highlight that GitHub's ease of setup and user-friendly interface contribute to a smoother onboarding experience, making it accessible for small businesses and new developers alike, while OpenText faces some challenges in this area, with users noting a steeper learning curve.
- Users report that while both platforms provide solid support, GitHub stands out with its higher quality of support ratings, which users attribute to responsive customer service and a vibrant community that aids in troubleshooting and knowledge sharing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,997
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.7
2,014
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
9.0
625
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.7
453
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.7
1,596
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
389
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,948
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
138
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
142
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
130
Not enough data
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.1
125
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.7
136
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
40
8.9
9
8.8
38
8.7
10
Analysis
8.4
39
8.3
11
8.7
42
8.0
11
8.6
39
8.8
11
8.8
44
8.5
10
Testing
9.1
40
8.1
9
8.2
34
6.9
9
8.4
36
8.7
10
8.5
33
8.5
8
8.3
32
7.0
9
8.6
33
8.3
9
8.0
32
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
94
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
93
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
240
Not enough data
9.2
248
Not enough data
8.8
232
Not enough data
Management
9.0
240
Not enough data
8.4
226
Not enough data
9.0
244
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
Not enough data
8.8
181
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
179
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Management
8.8
132
Not enough data
9.1
140
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
138
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
8.9
208
Not enough data
8.6
197
Not enough data
Management
8.8
217
Not enough data
8.8
212
Not enough data
8.2
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
176
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
