Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in Ease of Use with a score of 8.7, making it more accessible for small businesses and new developers, while OpenText ALM Quality Center has a lower score of 7.8, indicating a steeper learning curve for users.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Integration capabilities are robust, scoring 8.1, allowing seamless connections with various tools, whereas OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in Deployment-Ready Staging with a score of 9.0, making it ideal for enterprise-level deployment processes.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Task Management feature, scoring 8.9, which is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in managing development tasks, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's Test Repository feature scores even higher at 9.1, showcasing its strength in managing extensive testing documentation.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, indicating a responsive support team, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's support is rated lower at 7.7, suggesting potential delays in assistance.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Product Direction is viewed positively at 8.9, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement, whereas OpenText ALM Quality Center's score of 6.8 suggests some concerns about its future development trajectory.
- Users say that GitHub's Extensibility is rated at 8.9, allowing for significant customization and integration with third-party applications, while OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.8, also offers extensibility but may not match the flexibility that GitHub provides for smaller teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
6.8
116
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
8.3
11
8.9
188
9.2
12
9.0
192
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
9.0
12
8.9
196
9.2
12
9.0
184
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
