Compare GitHub and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,310)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, with users praising its straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple contributors are involved. This makes it a top choice for teams looking to streamline their coding processes.
- Users say that OpenText Application Quality Management provides a comprehensive solution for managing the software development life cycle, effectively handling everything from requirements gathering to defect tracking. This holistic approach is appreciated by those who need a centralized tool for their development activities.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's ease of use is a significant advantage, with many users highlighting its intuitive interface that simplifies version control and project management. This user-friendly design is particularly beneficial for small businesses and teams new to software development.
- According to verified reviews, OpenText Application Quality Management is noted for its structured approach, with features that allow for separate tracking of requirements, test cases, and defects. However, some users feel that this complexity can be overwhelming for new users, contrasting with GitHub's more accessible setup.
- G2 reviewers highlight that GitHub's strong community and extensive resources contribute to its high satisfaction ratings, making it easier for users to find support and learn best practices. This community aspect is a key differentiator for teams looking for ongoing guidance and collaboration.
- Users report that while OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust analytics and reporting features, it may not be as agile as GitHub in adapting to user feedback and evolving needs. This can be a drawback for teams that prioritize flexibility and rapid iteration in their development processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,997
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.7
2,014
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.0
625
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.7
453
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.7
1,596
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
389
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,948
6.8
116
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
138
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
142
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
130
Not enough data
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.1
125
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.7
136
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
40
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
39
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
40
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
94
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
93
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Functionality
9.1
240
Not enough data
9.2
248
Not enough data
8.8
232
Not enough data
Management
9.0
240
Not enough data
8.4
226
Not enough data
9.0
244
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
8.3
11
8.8
181
9.2
12
9.0
185
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
9.0
12
8.9
196
9.2
12
9.0
179
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Management
8.8
132
Not enough data
9.1
140
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
138
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
8.9
208
Not enough data
8.6
197
Not enough data
Management
8.8
217
Not enough data
8.8
212
Not enough data
8.2
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
176
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
