Compare GitHub and Octopus Deploy 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Free
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,309)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansOctopus Deploy
Star Rating
(58)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, with users praising its straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple contributors are involved. This makes it a top choice for teams looking to enhance their coding collaboration.
- Users say that Octopus Deploy provides a seamless deployment experience, following best practices for deployment management. Reviewers appreciate its ability to automate application deployments across various environments, making releases consistent and easy to manage.
- According to verified reviews, GitHub's overall user satisfaction is significantly higher, reflected in its G2 Scores across multiple categories. Users highlight its integration of coding, collaboration, and version control, which positions it as a vital tool for software project management.
- Reviewers mention that while Octopus Deploy is effective for handling complex deployment workflows, it may not match the level of community engagement and support that GitHub offers, as evidenced by the stark difference in recent review activity.
- G2 reviewers note that GitHub's ease of setup and user-friendly interface contribute to a smoother onboarding experience, with many users appreciating how quickly they can start collaborating on projects compared to Octopus Deploy, which has received feedback about its more complex setup process.
- Users highlight that GitHub's extensive market presence and popularity among small businesses provide a robust ecosystem for developers, while Octopus Deploy, although favored in enterprise settings, may not offer the same level of accessibility for smaller teams looking to adopt deployment automation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Octopus Deploy
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,997
9.0
52
Ease of Use
8.7
2,014
8.6
52
Ease of Setup
9.0
625
7.7
33
Ease of Admin
8.7
453
8.2
28
Quality of Support
8.7
1,596
8.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
389
8.5
25
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,948
8.7
52
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
138
8.6
14
9.0
145
8.8
16
8.6
138
8.8
16
Functionality
8.9
142
9.6
16
8.5
126
8.6
12
8.8
130
8.6
14
9.0
142
9.0
15
8.1
125
6.9
6
Processes
9.0
142
8.9
15
8.7
136
8.8
16
8.6
137
8.4
15
Administration
9.0
40
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
39
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
40
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
94
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
93
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
240
9.4
6
9.2
248
9.0
7
8.8
232
9.2
6
Management
9.0
240
9.3
7
8.4
226
8.1
6
9.0
244
8.6
7
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
Not enough data
8.8
181
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
179
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Management
8.8
132
Not enough data
9.1
140
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
138
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.9
208
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.6
197
Not enough data
Management
8.8
217
10.0
5
|
Verified
8.8
212
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.2
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
176
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Octopus Deploy are categorized as Application Release Orchestration, Continuous Delivery, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, and Build Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Octopus Deploy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
25.9%
Insurance
5.6%
Internet
5.6%
Building Materials
3.7%
Other
29.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
Octopus Deploy has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
