Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Mend.io 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,268)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansMend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connectivity with various tools and services, while Mend.io's integration score of 8.8, although strong, indicates slightly less versatility in this area.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Setup is rated at 9.0, making it user-friendly for new users, whereas Mend.io's score of 8.1 suggests a more complex initial setup process that may require additional time and resources.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior Configuration Management with a score of 8.8, which facilitates better organization and control over project settings, compared to Mend.io's score of 8.0, indicating room for improvement in this functionality.
- Users on G2 emphasize that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, reflecting a strong commitment to customer service, while Mend.io matches this score, but reviewers note that GitHub's support is often more responsive and helpful based on user experiences.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment Automation features score 8.9, providing robust tools for continuous integration and delivery, whereas Mend.io's score of 8.2 suggests it may not offer the same level of automation efficiency, which could impact deployment speed.
- Users say that GitHub's Security Auditing capabilities are rated at 9.0, providing comprehensive oversight of code security, while Mend.io's score of 8.3 indicates a solid offering but may lack some advanced features that GitHub provides, as noted by reviewers seeking thorough security measures.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Mend.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,964
8.6
81
Ease of Use
8.7
1,980
8.3
82
Ease of Setup
9.0
591
8.1
50
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
8.2
50
Quality of Support
8.8
1,571
8.7
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
8.8
46
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,916
8.6
75
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
7.6
7
9.0
47
7.7
8
Analysis
8.7
47
7.3
11
8.9
50
7.6
11
8.9
48
8.2
11
9.0
50
7.6
11
Testing
9.3
49
7.2
10
8.6
44
Feature Not Available
8.7
45
7.2
9
8.9
43
7.7
10
8.7
42
Feature Not Available
9.0
43
7.4
9
8.5
42
5.0
9
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Protection
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
8.5
45
9.1
79
8.5
47
9.2
78
8.6
44
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
8.2
45
9.1
78
8.8
44
8.9
76
8.6
45
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Mend.io are categorized as Software Composition Analysis and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
Mend.io is categorized as Container Security and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
