Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Jit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,267)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansJit
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JitSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.2, allowing seamless connectivity with various development tools, while Jit, with a score of 8.5, offers fewer integration options, which can limit flexibility for teams looking to streamline their workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Jit shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.6 compared to GitHub's 8.7. Users appreciate Jit's responsive customer service, which is crucial for teams needing quick resolutions to issues.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior Deployment-Ready Staging feature, scoring 9.0, which facilitates smoother transitions from development to production. In contrast, Jit's deployment automation features, while effective, score slightly lower at 8.9, indicating a less robust offering.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Extensibility is rated at 8.8, allowing for a wide range of customizations and third-party plugins, whereas Jit, with a score of 7.9, has more limitations in this area, potentially hindering user adaptability.
- Reviewers say that Jit provides better Ease of Setup with a score of 9.4, making it more user-friendly for new teams, while GitHub's score of 9.0, although still strong, indicates a slightly steeper learning curve for some users.
- Users report that GitHub's False Positives score of 8.1 is a concern, as it indicates a higher rate of incorrect alerts compared to Jit's score of 8.3, which suggests a more reliable detection system, crucial for maintaining workflow efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Jit
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Jit
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,963
8.9
42
Ease of Use
8.7
1,979
9.0
42
Ease of Setup
9.0
590
9.2
37
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
9.1
27
Quality of Support
8.8
1,570
9.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
9.6
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,915
9.7
43
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
8.1
22
9.0
47
8.0
22
Analysis
8.7
47
8.1
26
8.9
50
8.1
25
8.9
48
8.9
25
9.0
50
9.0
20
Testing
9.3
49
6.6
20
8.6
44
6.9
20
8.7
45
8.7
20
8.9
43
8.3
20
8.7
42
8.2
17
9.0
43
8.9
19
8.5
42
7.4
18
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
16
Analysis
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
9.4
16
Not enough data
9.2
14
Testing
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Network
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
7.1
21
Not enough data
8.4
22
Application
Not enough data
7.0
21
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.3
20
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
8.3
7
9.1
79
8.8
7
9.2
78
8.9
6
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
8.1
9
9.1
78
8.5
8
8.9
76
8.3
9
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
137
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
135
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
8.6
23
8.8
179
8.3
23
8.6
170
8.5
24
Security
8.3
167
7.9
25
8.6
168
8.2
23
9.0
177
8.3
24
Security
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Tracking
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.1
14
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.1
15
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
7.8
16
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Jit are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Software
30.2%
Financial Services
14.0%
Telecommunications
11.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Other
30.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Jit has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
