Compare GitHub and Jit 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,336)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansJit
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JitSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, with users praising its straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple contributors are involved. This makes it a go-to platform for managing software projects effectively.
- Users say that Jit stands out for its efficiency in reducing waste, with feedback highlighting how it simplifies the management of security controls within development workflows. This integration helps teams maintain focus on building features while ensuring security practices are seamlessly incorporated.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's overall user satisfaction is notably high, reflected in its impressive G2 Score. Many users appreciate the platform's ability to combine coding, collaboration, and version control all in one place, making it essential for developers.
- According to verified reviews, Jit is recognized for its lightweight setup process, which users find easier compared to other security tools. This ease of implementation is particularly beneficial for teams looking to integrate security without adding complexity to their workflows.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while GitHub has a robust feature set, some users feel it could improve in areas like ease of administration. However, its strong community and extensive resources help mitigate these challenges, making it a reliable choice for many.
- Users appreciate that Jit integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, allowing developers to catch vulnerabilities early in the development process. This proactive approach to security is a significant advantage for teams focused on maintaining high-quality code while managing risks effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Jit
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Jit
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
2,022
8.9
42
Ease of Use
8.7
2,039
9.0
42
Ease of Setup
9.0
650
9.2
37
Ease of Admin
8.7
454
9.1
27
Quality of Support
8.7
1,614
9.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
390
9.6
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,968
9.7
43
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
140
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
144
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.1
127
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
143
Not enough data
8.7
138
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
41
8.1
22
8.8
38
8.0
22
Analysis
8.3
40
8.1
26
8.7
43
8.1
25
8.6
40
8.9
25
8.8
45
9.0
20
Testing
9.1
41
6.6
20
8.2
34
6.9
20
8.4
36
8.7
20
8.5
33
8.3
20
8.3
32
8.2
17
8.6
34
8.9
19
8.0
32
7.4
18
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
16
Analysis
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
9.4
16
Not enough data
9.2
14
Testing
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Administration
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
90
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.1
95
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
94
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Network
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
7.1
21
Not enough data
8.4
22
Application
Not enough data
7.0
21
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.3
20
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
243
Not enough data
9.2
251
Not enough data
8.8
231
Not enough data
Management
9.0
242
Not enough data
8.4
228
Not enough data
9.0
247
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
189
Not enough data
8.8
182
Not enough data
9.0
187
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
197
Not enough data
9.0
178
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
65
8.3
7
9.0
70
8.8
7
9.1
70
8.9
6
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
67
8.1
9
9.0
70
8.5
8
8.8
69
8.3
9
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.1
145
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
142
Not enough data
8.9
140
Not enough data
8.6
126
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
129
Not enough data
9.1
145
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
224
Not enough data
8.9
209
Not enough data
8.6
198
Not enough data
Management
8.8
217
Not enough data
8.8
213
Not enough data
8.2
203
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.6
26
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
8.1
24
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
180
8.6
23
8.7
170
8.3
23
8.5
163
8.5
24
Security
8.2
158
7.9
25
8.5
160
8.2
23
8.9
171
8.3
24
Security
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Tracking
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.1
14
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
8.1
15
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
7.8
16
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Jit are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.1%
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.3%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.4%
Computer Software
30.2%
Financial Services
14.0%
Telecommunications
11.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Other
30.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
3 Comments
MR
GitHub provides a platform for developers across the world to collaborate on projects, regardless of their location. It has become a vital tool for...Read more
Jit has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
