Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and JFrog 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,279)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansJFrog
Star Rating
(105)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to JFrog. Users appreciate its intuitive features for version control and collaboration, highlighting tools like pull requests and branches that streamline team development.
- Users say GitHub's implementation process is quick and straightforward, with many praising its intuitive onboarding wizard. In contrast, JFrog, while noted for its scalability, has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate a less active user base or slower adoption.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's extensive integration capabilities with CI/CD tools enhance its usability for development teams. Users find it easy to manage projects and collaborate across functions, whereas JFrog, while effective for large teams, may not offer the same level of integration flexibility.
- According to verified reviews, GitHub's support quality is highly rated, with users noting responsive assistance and helpful resources. JFrog's support is also appreciated, but it doesn't quite match the level of satisfaction reported by GitHub users.
- G2 reviewers highlight GitHub's strong community and resource availability, which contribute to a rich ecosystem for developers. Users enjoy the variety of projects and repositories available, making it a go-to platform for many. JFrog, while effective for specific use cases like ML model deployment, may not have the same breadth of community engagement.
- Users report that GitHub's pricing model, starting at $0, makes it accessible for small businesses, which comprise a large portion of its user base. In contrast, JFrog's entry-level pricing begins at $150, which may limit its appeal to smaller organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
JFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
JFrog
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,973
8.5
77
Ease of Use
8.7
1,989
8.2
78
Ease of Setup
9.0
600
8.2
46
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
8.5
39
Quality of Support
8.7
1,580
8.4
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
8.5
38
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,925
8.5
71
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
143
7.1
8
9.1
149
6.9
8
8.7
146
7.7
8
Functionality
8.9
146
7.5
8
8.6
135
7.5
8
8.9
137
8.1
9
9.0
149
8.5
9
8.3
134
Feature Not Available
Processes
9.0
147
8.5
9
8.8
145
7.4
9
8.7
144
7.3
8
Administration
9.2
49
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
48
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
49
Not enough data
9.0
51
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
8.7
5
9.0
97
8.7
5
8.8
99
9.0
5
9.2
100
9.3
5
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Feature Not Available
8.8
97
8.7
5
8.9
91
Feature Not Available
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
7.7
5
8.9
89
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
240
8.0
9
9.1
243
8.1
9
8.8
239
8.7
10
Management
9.0
239
8.3
10
8.4
233
7.4
9
9.0
240
8.2
10
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.1
30
Not enough data
9.0
30
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
9.1
30
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
6.0
7
Not enough data
5.8
6
Management
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
4.0
5
Not enough data
6.2
7
Bug Reporting
8.9
192
Not enough data
8.9
189
Not enough data
9.0
194
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
187
Not enough data
8.9
198
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
6.5
10
9.1
139
7.5
10
8.6
133
7.3
10
Functionality
8.8
138
6.1
9
8.9
136
7.0
10
8.7
134
6.0
10
Processes
8.9
137
8.3
9
8.8
134
7.0
10
9.1
139
8.2
10
Functionality
9.3
225
8.2
10
9.0
213
8.2
10
8.7
205
7.8
9
Management
8.9
218
7.7
10
8.9
215
7.8
10
8.3
209
6.7
9
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
34
Not enough data
8.9
34
Not enough data
8.9
34
Not enough data
8.4
34
Not enough data
8.7
34
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
186
Not enough data
8.8
180
Not enough data
8.6
171
Not enough data
Security
8.3
168
Not enough data
8.6
169
Not enough data
9.0
178
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and JFrog are categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as Peer Code Review, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
JFrog is categorized as Repository Management, MLOps Platforms, Container Registry, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.8%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
14.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Internet
3.0%
Other
37.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
3 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
JFrog has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
