Compare Github Package Registry and JFrog 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (46.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Github Package Registry
Star Rating
(40)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Github Package RegistryJFrog
Star Rating
(116)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansGithub Package Registry vs JFrog
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Github Package Registry easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Github Package Registry overall.
- Reviewers felt that Github Package Registry meets the needs of their business better than JFrog.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Github Package Registry is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Github Package Registry over JFrog.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Github Package Registry
No pricing availableJFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
Free Trial
Github Package Registry
No trial information availableJFrog
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
34
8.6
79
Ease of Use
8.5
35
8.2
80
Ease of Setup
9.3
9
8.2
47
Ease of Admin
8.5
8
8.4
39
Quality of Support
8.9
33
8.4
68
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
7
8.5
38
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
35
8.4
73
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Functionality
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Processes
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
Management
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
29
7.1
8
8.4
29
6.5
8
8.8
30
6.0
7
8.1
26
5.8
6
Management
8.9
28
8.1
9
9.1
29
6.9
7
9.1
25
4.0
5
8.7
27
6.2
7
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Device Recognition
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Provisioning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
6.7
11
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Functionality
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
6.8
10
Not enough data
5.7
9
Processes
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.3
11
Functionality
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.7
8
Management
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
6.7
8
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Github Package Registry and JFrog are categorized as Repository Management
Unique Categories
Github Package Registry has no unique categories
JFrog is categorized as Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, MLOps Platforms, IoT Device Management Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Container Registry, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Continuous Integration, and Software Supply Chain Security Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Github Package Registry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.5%
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Financial Services
5.0%
Wholesale
2.5%
Telecommunications
2.5%
Other
27.5%
Information Technology and Services
31.4%
Computer Software
13.7%
Financial Services
7.8%
Computer & Network Security
5.9%
Hospital & Health Care
2.9%
Other
38.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Github Package Registry used for?
1 Comment
AP
for code repository for your organization, versioning, development and automation with DEV Ops tool. Read more
Github Package Registry has no more discussions with answers
JFrog has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
