Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitGuardian and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
$0.00 1 users
GitGuardian
Star Rating
(237)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Browse all 3 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,263)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various tools, while GitGuardian shines with a higher score of 9.2, indicating a more extensive range of integrations that enhance its functionality.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Setup is rated at 9.0, making it user-friendly for new users, whereas GitGuardian outperforms with a score of 9.6, suggesting a more streamlined onboarding process that users appreciate.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Quality of Support at 8.7, which is satisfactory but not exceptional, while GitGuardian's support is rated higher at 9.2, indicating that users find their assistance more responsive and helpful.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's False Positives score is 8.0, which can lead to unnecessary alerts, while GitGuardian struggles with a lower score of 6.7, suggesting that users experience more frequent false alarms, impacting their workflow.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment Automation is rated at 8.9, providing solid automation features, but GitGuardian's score of 8.8 indicates a comparable level of automation, with users appreciating both platforms for their deployment capabilities.
- Users say that GitHub's Documentation feedback score is 8.7, which is decent, but GitGuardian's higher score of 9.2 suggests that its documentation is more comprehensive and easier to navigate, enhancing user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitGuardian
GitGuardian Secrets Detection – Free
$0.00
For teams of 25 developers or fewer and open-source projects.
- Detect 350+ types of specific, generic, or even your custom patterns
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
GitGuardian
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
206
9.3
1,961
Ease of Use
9.1
208
8.7
1,977
Ease of Setup
9.5
101
9.0
588
Ease of Admin
9.3
57
8.7
450
Quality of Support
9.2
159
8.8
1,568
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
46
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
198
8.9
1,913
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.7
143
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
144
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
9.0
146
Not enough data
8.3
132
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.8
143
Not enough data
8.7
141
Administration
8.9
57
9.1
47
Feature Not Available
9.0
46
Analysis
9.0
70
8.7
46
9.3
68
8.8
49
9.3
66
8.8
47
9.0
67
8.9
49
Testing
8.0
54
9.2
48
8.0
48
8.6
43
8.2
52
8.7
44
Feature Not Available
8.8
42
Feature Not Available
8.7
41
9.1
58
8.9
42
6.5
58
8.5
41
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.6
11
10.0
13
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
97
Not enough data
9.0
96
Not enough data
8.8
98
Not enough data
9.2
98
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
96
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.7
95
Not enough data
8.9
90
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
98
Not enough data
8.9
90
Not enough data
8.9
88
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
237
Not enough data
9.2
240
Not enough data
8.8
237
Management
Not enough data
9.0
235
Not enough data
8.5
230
Not enough data
9.0
238
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.2
28
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
190
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
9.0
191
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
185
Not enough data
8.9
195
Not enough data
9.0
183
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
25
Not enough data
9.4
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
73
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
9.2
76
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
8.9
74
Management
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
9.2
135
Not enough data
8.6
132
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
133
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.7
133
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.8
133
Not enough data
9.1
137
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
222
Not enough data
8.9
211
Not enough data
8.7
203
Management
Not enough data
8.9
216
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
8.8
32
Documentation
9.2
124
8.8
183
9.1
122
8.8
178
8.9
123
8.6
169
Security
6.7
123
8.3
166
8.3
119
8.5
167
9.0
119
9.0
176
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitGuardian and GitHub are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
GitGuardian has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, and Build Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitGuardian
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
41.6%
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Program Development
5.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Other
28.3%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitGuardian used for?
1 Comment
KL
Hi, it's used for situations where you accidentally push code to GitHub, where you've forgotten to use environment variables for - for example - and some...Read more
GitGuardian has no more discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
