# Git vs P4 Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that Git excels in its ability to track changes and manage code versions effectively, making it a favorite among developers for its robust version control features. Users appreciate how easy it is to review changes, identify contributors, and maintain a clear history of modifications.
- **Users say** that P4 offers a straightforward experience for tracking changelists and file history, which can be beneficial for teams accustomed to its interface. However, some reviewers feel that it lacks the advanced features that modern development workflows often require.
- **Reviewers mention** that Git's implementation process is quick and intuitive, with many users highlighting the onboarding experience as a strong point. This ease of setup allows teams to start using the tool effectively right away, which is crucial for fast-paced development environments.
- **According to verified reviews** , while P4 has a solid support rating, Git's overall support experience is slightly less favorable. Users have noted that while P4's support is reliable, Git's community and resources provide a more extensive network for troubleshooting and learning.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that Git's features like branching, merge requests, and AI suggestions significantly enhance collaboration among team members. This functionality is particularly appreciated in environments where multiple developers are working on the same project simultaneously.
- **Users report** that while P4 is easy to use, it may not offer the same level of innovation and adaptability as Git. Some users feel that P4 is more about familiarity than cutting-edge features, which could limit its appeal to teams looking for modern solutions.



| | Git | P4 | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.7 out of 5 | 4.2 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 533 | 95 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (35.6% of reviews) | Enterprise (38.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 


---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Git | P4 | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 9.4 (463 reviews) | 8.4 (86 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 8.2 (465 reviews) | 7.7 (87 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 9.1 (132 reviews) | 7.3 (41 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.2 (72 reviews) | 7.7 (42 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.7 (377 reviews) | 8.8 (73 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.7 (57 reviews) | 8.6 (41 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 9.1 (449 reviews) | 7.7 (82 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Git

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### P4

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Repository Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Git** | N/A | N/A |
| **P4** | 9.0/10 | 5 |

#### Functionality

| Feature | Git | P4 | 
|---|---|---|
| **Package Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Integration** | Not enough data | 9.0 (5 reviews) | 
| **Code Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Checks** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Management

| Feature | Git | P4 | 
|---|---|---|
| **Package Access Control** | Not enough data | 9.0 (5 reviews) | 
| **Package Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Rollback** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Version Control Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software)


**Unique to P4 (4):** [Version Control Hosting Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-hosting), [Version Control Clients](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-clients), [Gaming Tools ](https://www.g2.com/categories/gaming-tools), [Repository Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/repository-management)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Git | P4 | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 35.6% | 24.7% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 29.0% | 36.6% | 
| **Enterprise** | 35.4% | 38.7% | 

### By Industry

#### Git

- **Computer Software:** 32.9%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 20.8%
- **Internet:** 8.7%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.0%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 2.9%
- **Education Management:** 2.9%
- **Higher Education:** 1.9%
- **Financial Services:** 1.9%
- **Computer Networking:** 1.7%
- **Automotive:** 1.5%
- **Other:** 20.8%

#### P4

- **Computer Games:** 16.1%
- **Computer Software:** 16.1%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 12.9%
- **Entertainment:** 6.5%
- **Wireless:** 4.3%
- **Semiconductors:** 3.2%
- **Consumer Electronics:** 3.2%
- **Defense & Space:** 3.2%
- **Machinery:** 3.2%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 3.2%
- **Other:** 28.0%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Git

- [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews)
- [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (87 reviews)
- [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews)
- [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews)
- [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews)
- [Mercurial](https://www.g2.com/products/mercurial/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (31 reviews)
- [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews)
- [Kiln](https://www.g2.com/products/kiln/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (1 reviews)

### Alternatives to P4

- [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews)
- [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (1008 reviews)
- [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (2354 reviews)
- [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews)
- [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (892 reviews)
- [SourceTree](https://www.g2.com/products/sourcetree/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (376 reviews)
- [Backlog](https://www.g2.com/products/backlog/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (432 reviews)
- [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews)
- [Mercurial](https://www.g2.com/products/mercurial/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (31 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Git

- Title: [What is Git used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-git-used-for) — 4 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "version control"
- Title: [sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf](https://www.g2.com/discussions/sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf) — 2 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "bad review"
- Title: [what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience](https://www.g2.com/discussions/29849-what-is-the-most-channeling-use-of-git-in-your-experience) — 2 comments
  > **Top comment:** "The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. "

### P4

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-p4)