Users report that OpenText AccuRev's "streaming" feature allows for efficient handling of large codebases, but reviewers mention that its user interface can be less intuitive compared to Git's more streamlined design.
Reviewers say that Git excels in "branching" capabilities, making it easier for teams to work on multiple features simultaneously, while users on G2 note that AccuRev's "branching" is less flexible and can lead to complications in larger projects.
G2 users highlight that Git's "merge" functionality is robust and well-documented, which contributes to a smoother workflow, whereas users report that AccuRev's "merge" process can be cumbersome and less user-friendly.
Reviewers mention that Git's integration with various CI/CD tools is a significant advantage, providing seamless automation, while users say that AccuRev's integration options are more limited, which can hinder development speed.
Users on G2 appreciate Git's strong community support and extensive resources available for troubleshooting, while reviewers say that AccuRev's support, although decent, does not match the breadth and responsiveness of Git's community.
Reviewers mention that OpenText AccuRev's "time-based" versioning is beneficial for enterprise-level projects, but users report that Git's "commit history" feature is more transparent and easier to navigate for everyday use.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Git
No pricing available
OpenText AccuRev
No pricing available
Free Trial
Git
No trial information available
OpenText AccuRev
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
429
8.1
20
Ease of Use
8.1
431
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
8.9
98
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
69
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
346
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.