Users report that OpenText AccuRev's integration capabilities are robust for enterprise environments, but reviewers mention that the learning curve can be steep, making it less user-friendly compared to Git Tower.
Reviewers say that Git Tower excels in ease of use, with a user-friendly interface that simplifies version control tasks, while users on G2 note that OpenText AccuRev's interface feels outdated and less intuitive.
G2 users highlight that OpenText AccuRev's support quality is decent, but users report that response times can be slow, whereas Git Tower users mention consistently high-quality support with quick response times and helpful resources.
Reviewers mention that OpenText AccuRev is particularly strong in handling large-scale enterprise projects, but users say that its product direction feels stagnant, with limited updates, while Git Tower users appreciate its regular updates and feature enhancements.
Users on G2 report that Git Tower's setup process is straightforward and quick, contrasting with OpenText AccuRev, where users mention that the setup can be complex and time-consuming, especially for new users.
Reviewers say that while OpenText AccuRev meets basic requirements for version control, Git Tower significantly outperforms in user satisfaction, with a higher rating in meeting user needs and overall functionality.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Git Tower
No pricing available
OpenText AccuRev
No pricing available
Free Trial
Git Tower
Free Trial is available
OpenText AccuRev
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
123
8.1
20
Ease of Use
9.2
125
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
9.3
36
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.2
21
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.2
107
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.