Users report that django CMS excels in its Rich Text Editor, scoring 9.2, which allows for a more intuitive content creation experience compared to Ghost's score of 8.0. Reviewers mention that this feature significantly enhances their ability to format and style content easily.
Reviewers mention that Ghost shines in Content Authoring, with a score of 8.9, indicating a more user-friendly interface for creating and managing content. In contrast, django CMS scored 8.3, which some users feel could be improved for a smoother authoring process.
G2 users highlight the Quality of Support for django CMS, which received a high score of 9.3. Users report that the support team is responsive and helpful, while Ghost's support, scoring 8.3, is seen as adequate but not as robust.
Users on G2 note that django CMS offers better Enterprise Scalability with a score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for businesses looking to grow. Ghost, with a score of 7.6, is perceived as less capable of handling larger-scale operations.
Reviewers mention that Ghost's SEO capabilities are impressive, scoring 8.7, which users say helps them optimize their content effectively. In comparison, django CMS scored 7.1, leading some users to seek additional SEO tools to enhance their visibility.
Users report that both platforms offer solid Mobile Optimization, with both scoring 8.9. However, reviewers mention that django CMS provides a more seamless experience across devices, which is crucial for users targeting mobile audiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ghost
Basic
$29
per month, billed annually - $36 billed monthly
For professional publishers who are just getting started
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.