Compare Gatekeeper vs Qwilr

See this
comparison of Gatekeeper vs. Qwilr
based on data from user reviews. Gatekeeper rates 4.4/5 stars with 22 reviews. Qwilr rates 4.5/5 stars with 280 reviews. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews.

Pricing

 
ENTERPRISE
$2,950
Month
Pro
$29
per Month
 
STARTER
$695
Month
Business
$79
per Month
 
Pro
$1,650
Month
Enterprise
Custom
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial
Gatekeeper
ENTERPRISE
$2,950Month
STARTER
$695Month
Pro
$1,650Month
Free Trial Unavailable
Qwilr
Pro
$29per Month
Business
$79per Month
Enterprise
Custom
Free Trial

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
8.6
8.4
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
8.8
8.7
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
7.4
8.9
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
8.3
8.8
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
9.0
9.0
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
9.0
9.2
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
9.5
Meets Requirements
Gatekeeper
8.6
Qwilr
8.4
Ease of Use
Gatekeeper
8.8
Qwilr
8.7
Ease of Setup
Gatekeeper
7.4
Qwilr
8.9
Ease of Admin
Gatekeeper
8.3
Qwilr
8.8
Quality of Support
Gatekeeper
9.0
Qwilr
9.0
Ease of Doing Business With
Gatekeeper
9.0
Qwilr
9.2
Product Direction (% positive)
Gatekeeper
8.9
Qwilr
9.5

Features

Contract Management Platform Features
Contract Creation
Gatekeeper
Not enough data available
Qwilr
9.4
Contract Templates
Gatekeeper
Not enough data available
Qwilr
7.0
Contract Editing
Gatekeeper
Not enough data available
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Contract Attachments
Gatekeeper
8.9
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Contract Collaboration
Gatekeeper
9.2
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Approval Process
Gatekeeper
8.6
Qwilr
8.3
Notifications & Reminders
Gatekeeper
9.3
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Contract Database
Gatekeeper
9.6
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Integrations / APIs
Gatekeeper
Not enough data available
Qwilr
Not enough data available
Reporting & Dashboards
Gatekeeper
8.1
Qwilr
7.7

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
18.2%
87.8%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
59.1%
10.8%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
22.7%
1.4%
Gatekeeper
Small-Business
18.2%
Mid-Market
59.1%
Enterprise
22.7%
Qwilr
Small-Business
87.8%
Mid-Market
10.8%
Enterprise
1.4%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Marketing and Advertising
31.5%
 
Non-Profit Organization Management
12.1%
Internet
9.6%
 
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Computer Software
8.7%
 
Financial Services
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
 
Telecommunications
6.1%
Design
4.5%
 
Other
48.5%
Other
38.3%
Gatekeeper
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Non-Profit Organization Management
12.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Telecommunications
6.1%
Other
48.5%
Qwilr
Marketing and Advertising
31.5%
Internet
9.6%
Computer Software
8.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
Design
4.5%
Other
38.3%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ability to customize gatekeeper into what fits your needs. You can add or take away as many add-ons which makes it super user friendly.

Courtney C.
User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ease of use and the support that is offered. The overall look of the site and presentations are great.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Financial Services

Gatekeeper does have limited functionality. For example, we use the event feature but the fact that an email is sent out at event creation and also when the event is due is causing confusion to our end users.

G2 User in Public Policy

Auditing on e-signing not strong enough for all jurisdictions. Find we're using multiple products to close deals. Some other payment vendors would also be useful - compatible with major international banking transfer systems.

 
Gatekeeper
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ability to customize gatekeeper into what fits your needs. You can add or take away as many add-ons which makes it super user friendly.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Financial Services

Gatekeeper does have limited functionality. For example, we use the event feature but the fact that an email is sent out at event creation and also when the event is due is causing confusion to our end users.

Qwilr
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Courtney C.
User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ease of use and the support that is offered. The overall look of the site and presentations are great.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Public Policy

Auditing on e-signing not strong enough for all jurisdictions. Find we're using multiple products to close deals. Some other payment vendors would also be useful - compatible with major international banking transfer systems.

Screenshots

 
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6

Videos

 

Please see our suite of videos covering the following topics:

Gatekeeper Explained
Dashboards & Reports
Contract Lifecycle Management
Strategic Supplier Management
Customising Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper Collaboration
Gatekeeper Help Desk

1. Product video showing what Qwilr is all about (90 seconds).
2. Introductory overview video showing Qwilr basics (150 seconds).
3. Fundamentals webinar covering Qwilr's most popular features (21 minutes).

Gatekeeper

Please see our suite of videos covering the following topics:

Gatekeeper Explained
Dashboards & Reports
Contract Lifecycle Management
Strategic Supplier Management
Customising Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper Collaboration
Gatekeeper Help Desk

Qwilr

1. Product video showing what Qwilr is all about (90 seconds).
2. Introductory overview video showing Qwilr basics (150 seconds).
3. Fundamentals webinar covering Qwilr's most popular features (21 minutes).

Ask Gatekeeper a QuestionContact GatekeeperAsk Qwilr a QuestionContact Qwilr
Add Product
Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper
Optimized for quick response
Qwilr
Qwilr
Optimized for quick response