Compare Ganttic vs Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Pricing
| ‐ | Project Professional (Project Managers) $1,159.99 | |
| ‐ | Project Standard (Project Managers) $589.99 | |
| ‐ | Project Online Premium $55 /User/Month | |
| ‐ | Project Online Professional $30 /User/Month | |
| ‐ | Project Online Essentials $7 /User/Month | |
Free Trial Unavailable | Free Trial Unavailable |
Ratings
| Meets Requirements | ||
| Ease of Use | ||
| Ease of Setup | ||
| Ease of Admin | ||
| Quality of Support | ||
| Ease of Doing Business With | ||
| Product Direction (% positive) |
Features
Reviewers' Company Size
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) |
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services 20.7% | Information Technology and Services 14.1% | |
Construction 10.3% | Hospital & Health Care 4.9% | |
Computer Software 10.3% | Higher Education 4.9% | |
Research 6.9% | Computer Software 4.7% | |
Writing and Editing 3.4% | Construction 4.4% | |
Other 48.3% | Other 67.0% |
Reviews
| Most Helpful Favorable Review | Administrator in Information Technology and Services 1. Visual representation of the company's resources - that's exactly what I was looking for when I found Ganttic. 2. Filtering by departments. That feature I found extremely convenient compared with several competitors I also considered. | John O. User in Computer Software Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to... |
| Most Helpful Critical Review | Administrator in Computer Software If you have a lot of projects and resources to manage, like our business, the resulting display is so messy and hard to see it in an organized view that it is not very helpful. You can run reports that help with this somewhat. | Brittany T. User in Computer Software It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use. |
