Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Functionize and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Functionize
Star Rating
(11)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Functionizemabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that mabl excels in its "Test Feedback" feature, providing detailed insights that help teams quickly identify issues, while Functionize's feedback mechanism is noted for being less intuitive, making it harder for users to act on the information provided.
- Reviewers mention that Functionize shines in "Quality of Support," achieving a perfect score of 10.0, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas mabl, while still strong at 9.2, does not reach the same level of satisfaction.
- G2 users highlight mabl's "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.0, noting that its user interface is straightforward and accessible for teams new to automated testing, while Functionize, with a slightly higher score of 9.2, is also user-friendly but may require a steeper learning curve for some features.
- Reviewers say that mabl's "Test Variety" is somewhat limited, scoring 8.5, which can restrict users looking for diverse testing scenarios, while Functionize offers a broader range of testing options, allowing for more comprehensive coverage of different use cases.
- Users on G2 report that mabl's "Customization" options, rated at 8.8, provide a good level of flexibility, but Functionize's customization capabilities are often highlighted as superior, enabling users to tailor their testing environments more extensively to fit specific needs.
- Users report that mabl's "Product Direction" score of 8.7 indicates a solid roadmap, but Functionize's perfect score of 10.0 suggests a more robust commitment to innovation and user feedback, which may be appealing for long-term planning.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Functionize
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Functionize
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
9
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.3
9
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.7
5
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
9.0
5
Quality of Support
10.0
8
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
5
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
8
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Functionize and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing, Software Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Functionize
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Retail
9.1%
Primary/Secondary Education
9.1%
Non-Profit Organization Management
9.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Functionize has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
