Join the 1500 companies using G2 Track to manage SaaS spend, usage, contracts & compliance.
Compare Function Point, MindManager, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Annually
$34
Per Subscriber/Month Billed Annually
MindManager for Windows
$349
Project Online Premium
$55
/User/Month
 
Monthly
$39
per Subscriber/Month Billed Monthly
MindManager for Mac
$179
Project Online Professional
$30
/User/Month
 
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Project Online Essentials
$7
/User/Month
 
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Function Point
Annually
$34Per Subscriber/Month Billed Annually
Monthly
$39per Subscriber/Month Billed Monthly
Free Trial Unavailable
MindManager
MindManager for Windows
$349
MindManager for Mac
$179
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.8
8.5
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
7.2
9.0
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
6.6
8.8
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
7.3
8.5
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
8.6
8.3
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
8.6
8.6
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
9.2
6.5
Meets Requirements
Function Point
7.8
MindManager
8.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
Function Point
7.2
MindManager
9.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
Function Point
6.6
MindManager
8.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
Function Point
7.3
MindManager
8.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
Function Point
8.6
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Function Point
8.6
MindManager
8.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Function Point
7.8
MindManager
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
Function Point
7.6
MindManager
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
Function Point
8.0
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
Function Point
7.1
MindManager
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
Function Point
7.3
MindManager
8.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
Function Point
6.6
MindManager
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
Function Point
7.3
MindManager
7.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
Function Point
7.7
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
Function Point
7.2
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
Function Point
7.3
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
Function Point
6.8
MindManager
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
Function Point
7.9
MindManager
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
Function Point
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
Function Point
7.1
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
Function Point
7.4
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
Function Point
Not enough data available
MindManager
9.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
Function Point
7.4
MindManager
9.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
Function Point
7.5
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
Function Point
8.0
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
Function Point
7.1
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
Function Point
6.8
MindManager
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Resource Management
Resource Database
Function Point
7.5
MindManager
6.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
Function Point
7.5
MindManager
6.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
Function Point
7.5
MindManager
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
Function Point
8.6
MindManager
6.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
Function Point
7.7
MindManager
6.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
Function Point
5.1
MindManager
6.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
Function Point
8.0
MindManager
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
Function Point
6.2
MindManager
6.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
Function Point
7.3
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
Function Point
7.1
MindManager
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
Function Point
8.4
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
86.9%
44.8%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
10.2%
20.7%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
2.8%
34.5%
48.1%
Function Point
Small-Business
86.9%
Mid-Market
10.2%
Enterprise
2.8%
MindManager
Small-Business
44.8%
Mid-Market
20.7%
Enterprise
34.5%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Marketing and Advertising
64.2%
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Graphic Design
8.4%
Computer Software
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Design
6.0%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Public Relations and Communications
3.3%
Real Estate
5.6%
Construction
4.7%
 
Information Technology and Services
3.3%
Medical Devices
5.6%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
14.9%
Other
58.3%
Other
66.0%
Function Point
Marketing and Advertising
64.2%
Graphic Design
8.4%
Design
6.0%
Public Relations and Communications
3.3%
Information Technology and Services
3.3%
Other
14.9%
MindManager
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
Computer Software
11.1%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Real Estate
5.6%
Medical Devices
5.6%
Other
58.3%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ease of creating schedules and estimates and the ability to copy an existing project to reuse for another project. This saves tons of time and I can easily make tweaks as needed to accommodate any differences between the projects. Having the...

David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User

Lack of collaboration between the person submitting the task and the recipient ... back & forth comments

Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
Function Point
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 User in Marketing and Advertising

I like the ease of creating schedules and estimates and the ability to copy an existing project to reuse for another project. This saves tons of time and I can easily make tweaks as needed to accommodate any differences between the projects. Having the...

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User

Lack of collaboration between the person submitting the task and the recipient ... back & forth comments

MindManager
Most Helpful Favorable Review
David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Ask Function Point a QuestionContact Function PointAsk MindManager a QuestionContact MindManagerRequest More InformationRequest More Information