Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FOSSA and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FOSSA
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FOSSAVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Veracode Application Security Platform excels in its Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.3, providing thorough insights into code vulnerabilities, while FOSSA, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.6 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that FOSSA shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.8, making it more accessible for small businesses, whereas Veracode's score of 7.3 indicates a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that Veracode's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, which is commendable, but FOSSA edges ahead with a score of 8.3, suggesting a more responsive support team.
- Users on G2 report that FOSSA's Integration capabilities are rated at 9.2, allowing for seamless connections with other tools, while Veracode's integration score of 7.9 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers say that Veracode's Product Direction score of 6.3 reflects some concerns about its future development, whereas FOSSA's score of 8.8 suggests a more positive outlook and commitment to evolving its features.
- Users report that FOSSA's Extensibility is rated at an impressive 9.2, allowing for customization and adaptability, while Veracode's extensibility features are not as robust, leading to a lower score in this critical area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FOSSA
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
FOSSA
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
11
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.9
11
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
8.3
6
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.3
9
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
11
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FOSSA and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and Software Composition Analysis
Unique Categories
FOSSA is categorized as Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Static Code Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FOSSA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
40.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.7%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
6.7%
Information Technology and Services
6.7%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
FOSSA has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
