Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FOSSA and Mend.io 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FOSSA
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FOSSAMend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mend.io excels in its Security Auditing feature, scoring a high 9.0, which reviewers mention provides comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities, while FOSSA, with a score of 8.3, is noted for being less robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that FOSSA shines in Integration, achieving a score of 9.2, which users on G2 appreciate for its seamless connectivity with various tools, whereas Mend.io's score of 8.6 indicates it may not offer the same level of integration flexibility.
- G2 users highlight that Mend.io's Remediation Suggestions feature, scoring 8.2, is particularly helpful for guiding users through fixing vulnerabilities, while FOSSA's score of 8.1 suggests it may not provide as detailed or actionable recommendations.
- Users say that FOSSA's Language Support is impressive, with a score of 8.8, which reviewers mention allows for a broader range of programming languages, compared to Mend.io's score of 8.6, which may limit some users.
- Reviewers mention that Mend.io's Continuous Monitoring feature, scoring 8.8, is praised for its effectiveness in real-time vulnerability detection, while FOSSA's score of 8.5 indicates it may not be as proactive in this regard.
- Users report that Mend.io's Ease of Use score of 8.3 is slightly lower than FOSSA's 8.8, suggesting that while both are user-friendly, FOSSA may offer a more intuitive interface that enhances user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FOSSA
No pricing availableMend.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
FOSSA
Free Trial is available
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
11
8.6
81
Ease of Use
8.9
11
8.3
82
Ease of Setup
8.3
6
8.1
50
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.2
50
Quality of Support
8.3
9
8.7
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
46
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
11
8.6
75
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.7
8
Analysis
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Testing
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
5.0
9
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Protection
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
7
8.5
45
9.2
6
8.5
47
8.8
8
8.6
44
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.1
7
8.2
45
8.5
8
8.8
44
9.4
8
8.6
45
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FOSSA and Mend.io are categorized as Software Composition Analysis and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Unique Categories
FOSSA is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Mend.io is categorized as Container Security and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FOSSA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
40.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.7%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
6.7%
Information Technology and Services
6.7%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Discussions
FOSSA has no discussions with answers
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
