Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FOSSA and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00 1 users
FOSSA
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FOSSAGitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.2, which allows seamless connectivity with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, FOSSA, while also strong at 9.0, is noted for its Transparency feature, scoring 9.1, which provides clear visibility into software dependencies and compliance issues.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment Automation feature is highly rated at 8.9, making it easier for teams to automate their deployment processes. FOSSA, however, shines in Continuous Monitoring with a score of 8.9, ensuring that users are consistently updated on the status of their software components.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, making it user-friendly for new teams. On the other hand, FOSSA's Ease of Admin is rated higher at 9.3, indicating that once set up, it may offer a more manageable experience for ongoing administration tasks.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many praising the responsiveness of their support team. FOSSA, while slightly lower at 8.3, is noted for its comprehensive Documentation, which users find helpful for troubleshooting and understanding features.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Task Management feature scores 8.9, allowing teams to effectively track and manage their work. In contrast, FOSSA's Processes and Workflow feature is rated at 9.0, indicating a stronger focus on streamlining workflows and enhancing productivity.
- Users say that GitHub's False Positives rate is a concern, scoring only 8.0, which can lead to unnecessary alerts. FOSSA, however, boasts a higher score of 9.4 for Thorough Detection, suggesting it may provide more accurate results in identifying vulnerabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FOSSA
No pricing availableGitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
FOSSA
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
11
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
8.9
11
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
8.3
6
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.3
9
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
11
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
7
8.9
74
9.2
6
9.1
78
8.8
8
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.1
7
8.9
76
8.5
8
9.1
78
9.4
8
8.9
75
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FOSSA and GitHub are categorized as Software Composition Analysis
Unique Categories
FOSSA is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FOSSA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
40.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.7%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
6.7%
Information Technology and Services
6.7%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
FOSSA has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
