Users report that Portnox excels in Network Access with a score of 9.3, highlighting its robust capabilities in managing and securing network connections, while FortiNAC trails slightly behind at 8.6, indicating potential limitations in its network access features.
Reviewers mention that Portnox offers superior Ease of Use with a score of 9.0, making it more user-friendly for everyday operations compared to FortiNAC's score of 8.3, which some users find less intuitive.
G2 users note that Portnox shines in Quality of Support, scoring 8.9, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas FortiNAC's support is rated lower at 8.2, suggesting room for improvement in customer service.
Users on G2 highlight Portnox's strong performance in Network Segmentation with a score of 8.5, which is crucial for enhancing security, while FortiNAC does not have a score available for this feature, indicating a potential gap in its segmentation capabilities.
Reviewers mention that Portnox's Policy Optimization feature, scoring 7.5, could be improved, but it still offers a more streamlined approach compared to FortiNAC, which lacks specific feedback on this aspect, suggesting it may not prioritize policy management as effectively.
Users say that both products have a perfect score of 10.0 in Product Direction, indicating that both Portnox and FortiNAC are seen as forward-thinking solutions, but Portnox's overall higher ratings in other areas may make it a more appealing choice for long-term investment.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.