Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Forkable and Zerocater 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PostGrid Print & Mail
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Forkable
Star Rating
(19)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ForkableZerocater
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ZerocaterSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ZeroCater excels in its "Quality of Support," with a score of 9.3, indicating that customers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Forkable, with a score of 8.8, has room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Forkable shines in "Ease of Setup" and "Ease of Admin," both scoring a perfect 10.0, suggesting that users find it incredibly straightforward to get started and manage the software, whereas ZeroCater does not provide specific scores for these categories.
- G2 users highlight that ZeroCater has a strong "Product Direction" score of 4.8, but Forkable significantly outperforms it with a score of 9.1, indicating that users feel more confident in Forkable's future development and feature enhancements.
- Users on G2 report that Forkable has a higher overall "Ease of Use" rating at 9.7 compared to ZeroCater's 8.1, suggesting that users find Forkable's interface and functionality more intuitive and user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that ZeroCater is particularly well-suited for mid-market companies, as evidenced by its largest market segment of 72.7% of reviews, while Forkable is favored by small businesses, with 47.1% of reviews coming from that segment, indicating a difference in target audience and use case.
- Users report that while both products have received positive feedback, Forkable's higher G2 rating of 4.8 compared to ZeroCater's 4.3 suggests a stronger overall satisfaction among its users, reflecting a more favorable perception in the market.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Forkable
No pricing availableZerocater
No pricing availableFree Trial
Forkable
No trial information availableZerocater
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
14
8.3
9
Ease of Use
9.0
14
8.1
8
Ease of Setup
10.0
6
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
10.0
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
14
9.3
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
10.0
7
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
4.8
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Forkable and Zerocater are categorized as On-Demand Catering
Unique Categories
Forkable has no unique categories
Zerocater has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Forkable
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zerocater
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Biotechnology
16.7%
Translation and Localization
5.6%
Telecommunications
5.6%
Other
33.3%
Education Management
27.3%
Computer Software
27.3%
Hospitality
18.2%
Internet
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Discussions
Forkable has no discussions with answers
Zerocater has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
