Users report that FontBase excels in its font activation feature, scoring 8.1, while Typeface matches this with a higher score of 9.0, indicating that Typeface may offer a more seamless experience in activating fonts.
Reviewers mention that the drag and drop upload functionality in FontBase is rated at 8.7, which is impressive, but Typeface outshines it with a perfect score of 9.0, suggesting that users find Typeface's upload process to be more intuitive and efficient.
G2 users highlight that the preview feature in Typeface is particularly strong, scoring 9.4 compared to FontBase's 8.4, indicating that Typeface provides a better visual representation of fonts before use, which is crucial for design decisions.
Users on G2 report that FontBase's organization capabilities, particularly in categorization, scored lower at 6.8, while Typeface received a score of 8.0, suggesting that Typeface offers better tools for organizing fonts effectively.
Reviewers mention that FontBase has a solid font sync feature with a score of 8.8, but Typeface's score of 8.1 indicates that while both products perform well, FontBase may have a slight edge in keeping fonts synchronized across devices.
Users say that the overall ease of use for FontBase is rated at 9.0, which is higher than Typeface's 8.5, suggesting that FontBase may be more user-friendly for those new to font management software.
Yes, Fontbase is good! I look forward to its future. The price is right as well. It took me a little while to get used to it and to understand how it works...Read more
What is the best font software?
1 Comment
PR
It depends on what your operating system is and what your intent is. I am a big fan of Font Base for PC and Typeface for Mac. Typeface is part of the SetApp...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.