# Font Awesome vs Materialize Comparison | | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.5 out of 5 | 4.7 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 34 | 16 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (69.7% of reviews) | Small-Business (60.0% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 8.6 (30 reviews) | 9.4 (13 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.9 (30 reviews) | 9.5 (13 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | 8.7 (9 reviews) | Not enough data | | **Ease of Admin** | 8.3 (5 reviews) | Not enough data | | **Quality of Support** | 8.5 (26 reviews) | 8.1 (9 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 9.2 (30 reviews) | 9.0 (12 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### Font Awesome #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Materialize #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Features Comparison By Category ### Real-time Analytic Database | Product | Score | Reviews | |---|---|---| | **Font Awesome** | N/A | N/A | | **Materialize** | N/A | N/A | #### Query latency | Feature | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Lower query latency** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Continuous queries** | Not enough data | Not enough data | #### Data latency | Feature | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Lower data latency** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Data pipeline performance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | #### Connectors | Feature | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Faster ingestion** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Built-in connectors** | Not enough data | Not enough data | #### Scale | Feature | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Linearly scalable database** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Storage management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | #### Architecture | Feature | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Data security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Lockless architecture** | Not enough data | Not enough data | --- ## Categories **Unique to Font Awesome (1):** [Other Web Frameworks Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Unique to Materialize (1):** [Real-time Analytic Database Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/real-time-analytic-database) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | Font Awesome | Materialize | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 69.7% | 60.0% | | **Mid-Market** | 12.1% | 40.0% | | **Enterprise** | 18.2% | 0% | ### By Industry #### Font Awesome - **Computer Software:** 21.2% - **Information Technology and Services:** 18.2% - **Design:** 12.1% - **Telecommunications:** 9.1% - **Marketing and Advertising:** 6.1% - **Medical Practice:** 3.0% - **Market Research:** 3.0% - **Information Services:** 3.0% - **Hospitality:** 3.0% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.0% - **Other:** 18.2% #### Materialize - **Graphic Design:** 20.0% - **Computer Software:** 20.0% - **Information Technology and Services:** 13.3% - **Marketing and Advertising:** 6.7% - **Food Production:** 6.7% - **Financial Services:** 6.7% - **Design:** 6.7% - **Consumer Services:** 6.7% - **Biotechnology:** 6.7% - **Banking:** 6.7% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to Font Awesome - [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (25 reviews) - [IHP](https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (178 reviews) - [handlebars](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (13 reviews) - [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (83 reviews) - [ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/products/asp-net/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (59 reviews) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/products/gwt-google-web-toolkit/reviews) — 3.4/5 stars (15 reviews) - [Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/products/sinatra/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (21 reviews) - [JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/products/jquery-ui/reviews) — 3.6/5 stars (28 reviews) - [Netty](https://www.g2.com/products/netty/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (20 reviews) - [WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/products/webrtc/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (29 reviews) ### Alternatives to Materialize - [SingleStore](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (118 reviews) - [InfluxDB](https://www.g2.com/products/influxdata-influxdb/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (101 reviews) - [ClickHouse](https://www.g2.com/products/clickhouse/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (23 reviews) - [Aerospike](https://www.g2.com/products/aerospike/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (83 reviews) - [CrateDB](https://www.g2.com/products/cratedb/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (85 reviews) - [KX](https://www.g2.com/products/kx-kx/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (51 reviews) - [StarTree](https://www.g2.com/products/startree/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (29 reviews) - [Tiger Data](https://www.g2.com/products/tiger-data/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (33 reviews) - [Druid](https://www.g2.com/products/druid/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (31 reviews) - [Rayven](https://www.g2.com/products/rayven/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (30 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### Font Awesome - Title: [What is Font Awesome used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/font-awesome-what-is-font-awesome-used-for) — 1 comment > **Top comment:** "if you want to add any kind of icons this is a thrid party that you can use as a tool to integrate the icons" ### Materialize No discussions available for this product. --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-materialize)