Link copied to clipboard

# Font Awesome vs Materialize Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/font-awesome/materialize/export.csv)

Font AwesomeMaterialize[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Font Awesome** [

4.5/5(34)

](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews#reviews)

**Materialize** [

4.7/5(16)

](https://www.g2.com/products/materialize/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Font Awesome**
No pricing available

**Materialize**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Font Awesome**
Not enough reviews yet

**Materialize**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Font Awesome**
Not enough reviews yet

**Materialize**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Font Awesome**
$$$$$

**Materialize**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Font Awesome**
Not enough reviews yet

**Materialize**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Font Awesome**
Not enough data

**Materialize**
Not enough data

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Font Awesome**

8.6

8.630

**Materialize**

9.4

9.413

Ease of Use

**Font Awesome**

8.9

8.930

**Materialize**

9.5

9.513

Ease of Setup

**Font Awesome**

8.7

8.79

**Materialize**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**Font Awesome**

8.3

8.35

**Materialize**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Font Awesome**

8.5

8.526

**Materialize**

8.1

8.19

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Font Awesome**
Not enough data

**Materialize**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Font Awesome**

9.2

9.230

**Materialize**

9.0

9.012

Features

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Real-time Analytic Database[Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query latency

Lower query latency

Not enough data

Not enough data

Continuous queries

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data latency

Lower data latency

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data pipeline performance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Connectors

Faster ingestion

Not enough data

Not enough data

Built-in connectors

Not enough data

Not enough data

Scale

Linearly scalable database

Not enough data

Not enough data

Storage management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Architecture

Data security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Lockless architecture

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Font Awesome](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_133f6e1711beecafd50aa4f3c1e99e03/font-awesome.jpg "Font Awesome")](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews)

Font Awesome

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

69.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

12.1%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

18.2%

[![Materialize](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d055ea2f9991c277edda27bf955128f3/materialize.png "Materialize")](https://www.g2.com/products/materialize/reviews)

Materialize

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

60.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

40.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

0%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

69.7%

60.0%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

12.1%

40.0%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

18.2%

0%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Font Awesome](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_133f6e1711beecafd50aa4f3c1e99e03/font-awesome.jpg "Font Awesome")](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews)
Font Awesome

Computer Software

21.2%

Information Technology and Services

18.2%

Design

12.1%

Telecommunications

9.1%

Marketing and Advertising

6.1%

Other

33.3%

[![Materialize](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d055ea2f9991c277edda27bf955128f3/materialize.png "Materialize")](https://www.g2.com/products/materialize/reviews)
Materialize

Graphic Design

20.0%

Computer Software

20.0%

Information Technology and Services

13.3%

Marketing and Advertising

6.7%

Food Production

6.7%

Other

33.3%

Alternatives

**Font Awesome Alternatives**

 ![Material Design for Bootstrap](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_011d4070ca286cd9ea89a9b318384d21/material-design-for-bootstrap.jpg "Material Design for Bootstrap")

[
Material Design for Bootstrap
](/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews)

 ![handlebars](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d614e67c267b3180d9e57fef0fda346f/handlebars.png "handlebars")

[
handlebars
](/products/handlebars/reviews)

 ![IHP](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a413dec3607ff3e613ecd8d4aa45e80f/ihp.svg "IHP")

[
IHP
](/products/ihp/reviews)

 ![Ruby on Rails](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_10e24e60adf1cea0d13cea08a31426ad/ruby-on-rails.png "Ruby on Rails")

[
Ruby on Rails
](/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews)

**Materialize Alternatives**

 ![SingleStore](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/21cd4e6d2e8b28ee9e4528b72372d57b/singlestore.svg "SingleStore")

[
SingleStore
](/products/singlestore/reviews)

 ![InfluxDB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ffc338ba19cc780217d84bb08eab963c/influxdata-influxdb.svg "InfluxDB")

[
InfluxDB
](/products/influxdata-influxdb/reviews)

 ![ClickHouse](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1085fc1aec988cc21861ba894db51044/clickhouse.svg "ClickHouse")

[
ClickHouse
](/products/clickhouse/reviews)

 ![Aerospike](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ded488446753f4f05475296d18c80b5d/aerospike.svg "Aerospike")

[
Aerospike
](/products/aerospike/reviews)

## Font Awesome vs Materialize

- Reviewers felt that Materialize meets the needs of their business better than Font Awesome.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Font Awesome is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Font Awesome over Materialize.