Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Font Awesome and Material Design for Bootstrap 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Font Awesome
Star Rating
(33)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Font AwesomeMaterial Design for Bootstrap
Star Rating
(24)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Material Design for BootstrapSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Material Design for Bootstrap excels in its intuitive design and user-friendly interface, making it easier for developers to implement responsive designs quickly. Reviewers mention that the "Grid System" feature is particularly praised for its flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that Font Awesome shines with its extensive library of icons, which is a significant advantage for projects requiring a wide variety of visual elements. Users on G2 highlight the "Icon Search" functionality as a time-saver for finding the right icons efficiently.
- G2 users indicate that Material Design for Bootstrap has a higher rating for "Ease of Use" (9.0) compared to Font Awesome (8.9), suggesting that users find it more straightforward to integrate into their projects without extensive learning curves.
- Users say that while Font Awesome has a solid support system, Material Design for Bootstrap slightly edges it out with a quality of support rating of 8.6 versus Font Awesome's 8.5, indicating a marginally better experience when seeking help.
- Reviewers mention that the "Customization Options" in Material Design for Bootstrap are robust, allowing for greater flexibility in design, which is a key factor for developers looking to create unique user experiences.
- Users report that both products have strong product direction, but Font Awesome has a slightly higher positive feedback percentage (9.6) compared to Material Design for Bootstrap (9.4), suggesting that users feel more confident in Font Awesome's future development and updates.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Font Awesome
No pricing availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No pricing availableFree Trial
Font Awesome
No trial information availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
29
9.2
19
Ease of Use
9.0
29
9.0
21
Ease of Setup
8.5
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
25
8.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
29
9.4
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Font Awesome and Material Design for Bootstrap are categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Font Awesome has no unique categories
Material Design for Bootstrap has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Font Awesome
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Material Design for Bootstrap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Computer Software
18.8%
Design
12.5%
Telecommunications
9.4%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Other
34.4%
Computer Software
28.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
19.0%
Consulting
9.5%
Marketing and Advertising
9.5%
Oil & Energy
4.8%
Other
28.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Font Awesome has no discussions with answers
Material Design for Bootstrap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
