Link copied to clipboard # Font Awesome vs handlebars Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/font-awesome/handlebars/export.csv) Font Awesomehandlebars[+ Add Product](#) Reviews **Font Awesome** [ 4.5/5(34) ](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews#reviews) **handlebars** [ 3.9/5(13) ](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews#reviews) Pricing **Font Awesome** No pricing available **handlebars** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Font Awesome** Not enough reviews yet **handlebars** Not enough reviews yet Return on Investment **Font Awesome** Not enough reviews yet **handlebars** Not enough reviews yet Perceived Cost **Font Awesome** $$$$$ **handlebars** Not enough reviews yet Average Discount **Font Awesome** Not enough reviews yet **handlebars** Not enough reviews yet Pros & Cons **Font Awesome** Not enough data **handlebars** Not enough data Integrations **Font Awesome** Not enough data **handlebars** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_21a537a2f60ea582bd213cab0722cb1a/express-js.png "Product Avatar Image") Express.js ](https://www.g2.com/products/express-js/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_45a4ae445edc0b67d4453f93c5dab703/node-js.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") Node.js ](https://www.g2.com/products/node-js/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/integrations) Ratings Meets Requirements **Font Awesome** 8.6 8.630 **handlebars** 8.5 8.510 Ease of Use **Font Awesome** 8.9 8.930 **handlebars** 8.7 8.710 Ease of Setup **Font Awesome** 8.7 8.79 **handlebars** Not enough data Ease of Admin **Font Awesome** 8.3 8.35 **handlebars** Not enough data Quality of Support **Font Awesome** 8.5 8.526 **handlebars** 6.7 6.77 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Font Awesome** Not enough data **handlebars** Not enough data Product Direction (% positive) **Font Awesome** 9.2 9.230 **handlebars** 6.5 6.510 User Insights Reviewers' Company Size [![Font Awesome](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_133f6e1711beecafd50aa4f3c1e99e03/font-awesome.jpg "Font Awesome")](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) Font Awesome Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 69.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 12.1% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 18.2% [![handlebars](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d614e67c267b3180d9e57fef0fda346f/handlebars.png "handlebars")](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) handlebars Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 58.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 33.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 8.3% Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) 69.7% 58.3% Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 12.1% 33.3% Enterprise (\> 1000 emp.) 18.2% 8.3% Reviewers' Industry [![Font Awesome](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_133f6e1711beecafd50aa4f3c1e99e03/font-awesome.jpg "Font Awesome")](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) Font Awesome Computer Software 21.2% Information Technology and Services 18.2% Design 12.1% Telecommunications 9.1% Marketing and Advertising 6.1% Other 33.3% [![handlebars](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d614e67c267b3180d9e57fef0fda346f/handlebars.png "handlebars")](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) handlebars Computer Software 33.3% Education Management 16.7% Marketing and Advertising 8.3% Internet 8.3% Information Technology and Services 8.3% Other 25.0% FAQs ## Font Awesome vs handlebars FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 17, 2026 ### What is the difference between handlebars vs Font Awesome? Font Awesome stands out from handlebars with a higher G2 rating, stronger support scores, and a focus on icon libraries rather than templating logic. | [handlebars](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) | [Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 3.9/5 (13 reviews) | 4.5/5 (34 reviews) | | — | — | | — | 8.7 | | 6.7 | 8.5 | | Simplicity and clean separation of logic from presentation | Extensive icon library and easy integration | ### How do the pricing models of handlebars and Font Awesome compare? Font Awesome is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its price and cost structure compared to handlebars. - **handlebars:** In recent reviews, users appreciate its open-source nature and simplicity but do not highlight pricing as a key advantage. - **Font Awesome:** Reviewers note the free tier offers substantial value, though some mention the premium subscription reduces the number of free icons; overall, satisfaction with value remains high. ### What are the best alternatives to handlebars and Font Awesome? The top three alternatives to handlebars and Font Awesome are Material Design for Bootstrap, Datatables, and Ruby on Rails. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [handlebars](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) | 3.9/5 (13) | — | Simplicity and clean separation of logic from presentation | | [Font Awesome](https://www.g2.com/products/font-awesome/reviews) | 4.5/5 (34) | Free tier offers substantial value, premium reduces free icons | Extensive icon library and easy integration | | [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) | 4.6/5 (25) | — | Modern design components and flexibility | | [Datatables](https://www.g2.com/products/datatables/reviews) | 4.6/5 (20) | — | Powerful data handling and customization | | [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) | 4.5/5 (83) | — | Rapid development and strong community support | ### Which Other Web Frameworks features should I prioritize when comparing handlebars and Font Awesome? Buyers comparing handlebars and Font Awesome should prioritize ease of use, quality of support, extensibility, integration capabilities, and value for cost. - **Ease of Use:** handlebars 8.7, Font Awesome 8.9 - **Quality of Support:** handlebars 6.7, Font Awesome 8.5 - **Extensibility:** handlebars is praised for helpers and partials; Font Awesome for customizable icon kits - **Integration Capabilities:** Font Awesome is frequently cited for easy integration via CDN and compatibility with frameworks - **Value for Cost:** Font Awesome receives higher satisfaction on value, especially for its free tier ### What are the pros and cons of handlebars vs Font Awesome? Font Awesome's headline strength is its extensive icon library and ease of integration, while handlebars is valued for its simplicity and clean separation of logic from presentation. - **handlebars strengths:** Simplicity, clean separation of logic and presentation, easy to learn syntax, reliable helpers and partials, automatic escaping for security. - **handlebars trade-offs:** Limited for complex UI logic, requires custom helpers for advanced use, less developer-friendly debugging, lacks reactive data binding and component architecture, documentation can be sparse. - **Font Awesome strengths:** Extensive and customizable icon library, easy integration via CDN or HTML, high visual quality, supports SVG and font formats, strong compatibility with frameworks, free tier offers substantial value. - **Font Awesome trade-offs:** Premium subscription reduces free icon availability, some niche icons missing, occasional CDN downtime, documentation could be more user-friendly for new users. ### Is handlebars or Font Awesome better for small businesses? Font Awesome is the better fit for small businesses, with higher reviewer satisfaction and a strong presence in the small-business segment. - **handlebars:** Small-business reviewers highlight its simplicity and maintainability, but do not cite it as a leading choice for small-business needs. - **Font Awesome:** Small-business reviewers consistently praise its ease of use, icon variety, and value, making it a preferred choice for small teams and projects. ### Which Other Web Frameworks platform has better integrations? Font Awesome is favored for integrations, with reviewers frequently citing its compatibility with frameworks and ease of adding to projects. - **handlebars:** Reviewers mention integration with JavaScript frameworks and use in email templating, but do not cite specific third-party integrations in recent reviews. - **Font Awesome:** Reviewers highlight integration with WordPress, React, Angular, and Bootstrap, emphasizing its flexibility and ease of use across platforms. ### How do handlebars and Font Awesome compare on customer support? Font Awesome outperforms handlebars on Quality of Support by a material margin, with scores of 8.5 versus 6.7. - **handlebars:** Reviewers describe support as adequate but note sparse documentation and less developer-friendly error messages. - **Font Awesome:** Reviewers consistently report positive support experiences, citing helpful documentation and responsive assistance. ### Which is easier to implement, handlebars or Font Awesome? Font Awesome and handlebars are rated at parity for Ease of Setup, both scoring 7.0 in recent reviews. - **handlebars:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward, with easy integration into projects and minimal configuration required. - **Font Awesome:** Reviewers highlight simple integration via CDN or HTML, with most finding the process quick and user-friendly. Alternatives **Font Awesome Alternatives** ![Material Design for Bootstrap](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_011d4070ca286cd9ea89a9b318384d21/material-design-for-bootstrap.jpg "Material Design for Bootstrap") [ Material Design for Bootstrap ](/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) ![IHP](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a413dec3607ff3e613ecd8d4aa45e80f/ihp.svg "IHP") [ IHP ](/products/ihp/reviews) ![Ruby on Rails](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_10e24e60adf1cea0d13cea08a31426ad/ruby-on-rails.png "Ruby on Rails") [ Ruby on Rails ](/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) ![Datatables](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_01f10092d234ba97769716870beb1eb1/datatables.jpeg "Datatables") [ Datatables ](/products/datatables/reviews) **handlebars Alternatives** ![Datatables](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_01f10092d234ba97769716870beb1eb1/datatables.jpeg "Datatables") [ Datatables ](/products/datatables/reviews) ![Ruby on Rails](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_10e24e60adf1cea0d13cea08a31426ad/ruby-on-rails.png "Ruby on Rails") [ Ruby on Rails ](/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) ![JQuery UI](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_fc701efd1efff78ed459a71a79633040/jquery-ui.png "JQuery UI") [ JQuery UI ](/products/jquery-ui/reviews) ![IHP](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a413dec3607ff3e613ecd8d4aa45e80f/ihp.svg "IHP") [ IHP ](/products/ihp/reviews) ## Font Awesome vs handlebars - Reviewers felt that Font Awesome meets the needs of their business better than handlebars. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Font Awesome is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Font Awesome over handlebars.