Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Foleon and Shorthand 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Vyond
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UserEvidence
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Shorthand
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (38.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Custom Pricing
No pricing available
Foleon
Star Rating
(178)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (38.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Custom Pricing
Learn more about FoleonShorthand
Star Rating
(121)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ShorthandSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Foleon excels in its onboarding process, with users highlighting its "world-class" training sessions that help them quickly integrate their business processes into the platform. This contrasts with Shorthand, where users appreciate the ease of use but do not mention onboarding as a standout feature.
- Users say that Foleon's intuitive design allows for quick content creation, enabling them to produce magazines or event pages efficiently while utilizing brand kits. In comparison, Shorthand is praised for its beautiful and readable content, but some users feel it lacks the same level of customization options.
- Reviewers mention that Foleon's customer support is highly rated, with users noting prompt assistance and helpful guidance. Shorthand also receives positive feedback for its support, but Foleon's users seem to have a more consistent experience with their queries being resolved quickly.
- According to verified reviews, Foleon offers a range of unique features, such as special asset management capabilities that are not commonly found in other platforms. Shorthand, while versatile, is noted for its structured approach to content, which some users find limiting in terms of creative flexibility.
- Users highlight that Foleon's ease of use is complemented by its robust content authoring tools, which allow for a seamless creation experience. Shorthand, on the other hand, is recognized for its intuitive interface, but some users feel that it could benefit from more advanced authoring features.
- G2 reviewers indicate that Foleon's overall satisfaction scores are higher, reflecting a more favorable user experience across various metrics. While Shorthand has a solid user base, Foleon's larger number of reviews and positive feedback suggest a more reliable and satisfying product for mid-market users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Shorthand
No pricing availableFree Trial
Foleon
No trial information availableShorthand
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
146
9.0
94
Ease of Use
9.0
146
9.3
97
Ease of Setup
8.9
87
9.1
49
Ease of Admin
9.2
51
9.3
32
Quality of Support
9.4
142
9.6
88
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
50
9.4
33
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
140
9.1
93
Features by Category
Content
8.9
18
7.5
6
8.4
17
9.2
6
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.1
17
8.9
6
Feature Not Available
9.7
6
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.4
17
9.4
6
Feature Not Available
8.6
6
Feature Not Available
9.4
6
Design
8.6
17
9.2
6
8.8
19
9.4
6
8.9
19
9.2
6
8.9
19
9.2
6
Platform
Feature Not Available
8.3
6
7.7
17
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.6
6
8.8
17
8.3
6
8.7
15
8.6
6
7.1
13
8.9
6
8.1
17
8.9
6
7.3
15
8.9
6
Agentic AI - Web Content Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Creation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Optimization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Logistics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Creation
8.9
28
9.2
15
Agentic AI - Content Experience Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Optimization
8.0
22
8.5
9
Design
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
7
Planning
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Publishing
8.9
58
8.6
24
Social Media
Feature Not Available
7.7
25
Planning
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
7.0
21
6.3
24
7.0
21
5.9
23
Feature Not Available
5.7
24
Feature Not Available
6.0
24
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Content Creation
8.0
9
6.7
13
8.3
11
7.6
13
8.0
10
7.2
12
7.4
9
7.6
13
7.2
9
6.9
13
8.0
10
7.3
13
8.1
9
7.8
13
Platform - Owned Media
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Owned Media
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tools
7.8
17
Not enough data
8.0
17
Not enough data
7.7
15
Not enough data
Metrics
8.2
17
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
7.0
15
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Content Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Foleon and Shorthand are categorized as Content Experience Platforms, Content Creation, and Web Content Management
Unique Categories
Foleon is categorized as Content Analytics
Shorthand is categorized as Owned Media and Desktop Publishing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Foleon
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Shorthand
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
8.6%
Financial Services
7.4%
Insurance
6.3%
Computer Software
5.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
5.1%
Other
66.9%
Higher Education
14.8%
Non-Profit Organization Management
11.3%
Online Media
10.4%
Publishing
4.3%
Media Production
4.3%
Other
54.8%
Discussions
Can you speed up the implementation of the Gallery feature (it would help immensely).
2 Comments
SF
Hi there Ray!
Apologies for the late response, we seemed to have missed your question.
So due to features with higher priorities, we’re unfortunately...Read more
What is Foleon used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from Foleon
Great question!
Foleon is a content creation platform designed for businesses that need to produce engaging, interactive, and scalable digital content....Read more
Foleon has no more discussions with answers
Shorthand has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
