Link copied to clipboard # FloQast vs Workiva Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/floqast/workiva-workiva/export.csv) FloQastWorkiva[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **FloQast** No pricing available **Workiva** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **FloQast** 2 monthsFaster Based on 78 responses **Workiva** 4 months Based on 39 responses Return on Investment **FloQast** 11 months Based on 60 responses **Workiva** 10 months1 month sooner Based on 39 responses Perceived Cost **FloQast** $$$$$ **Workiva** $$$$$ Average Discount **FloQast** 12%2% more **Workiva** 10% ![FloQast](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/78861d3dfdeb104e5b7f6fb16ac800ee/floqast.svg "FloQast") ![Workiva](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8845cbdae0f5f9ef98fcde16c1e2f544/workiva-workiva.svg "Workiva") G2 offers free advice on this comparison. Chat with an expert How would you like to receive Software Advice? ![](/assets/advisor_router/laptop_form-f1a7012279826105416befde8d882ffc7589b1f9db09c93a1379d601cafe8e0d.svg) FormAnswer questions at your own pace, no call required. ![](/assets/advisor_router/ai_agent-4d78629a3ba354fed449a65c60df3a6f2eda90fb98411b711df4b25d7be52a38.svg) AI AgentChat live and get a recommendation in minutes. ![](/assets/advisor_router/phone_call_picker-c48821ec36f4182d8ee3e54cfbd3937500eec54d7b7e0cfb80dc80a8a733842f.svg) Phone CallTalk it through live with a software advisor. **Pros & Cons** from reviews **FloQast** [ Ease of Use (169) ](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1306960&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Organization (98) ](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1306485&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (48) ](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1305450&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Limited Functionality (35) ](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1306766&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **Workiva** [ Ease of Use (439) ](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1423405&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Collaboration (238) ](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1424195&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (148) ](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1421574&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Limited Functionality (102) ](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1424974&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **FloQast** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_503cf5e186719f19349655ac4f7d0358/excel-to-word-document-automation.PNG "Product Avatar Image") Excel-to-Word Document... ](https://www.g2.com/products/excel-to-word-document-automation/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_9e189c9a0582c6b3467658109ad95bd9/oracle-netsuite.png "Product Avatar Image") NetSuite ](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-netsuite/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_82f55e945509bff7b8009e8024cfe73c/oracle-database.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Oracle Database ](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-database/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_aca40b5464fcf97310dbc332c2296b5c/oracle-financials-cloud.png "Product Avatar Image") Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials ](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-fusion-cloud-financials/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/integrations) **Workiva** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_f354d880569c8299f3f347a8a7a52bac/adaptive-adaptive.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") Adaptive ](https://www.g2.com/products/adaptive-adaptive/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_e89d21750715f4646ed61c011b2917dc/adobe-acrobat.png "Product Avatar Image") Adobe Acrobat ](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-acrobat/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_156527410a602a545aa9c74d45666e04/appian.png "Product Avatar Image") Appian ](https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_c4cea305272e01c609da9349efe4aba2/canvas-lms.png "Product Avatar Image") Canvas LMS ](https://www.g2.com/products/canvas-lms/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/integrations) Screenshots **FloQast** ![FloQast screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1286703/updated-all-worklows-dashboard.png) **Workiva** ![Workiva screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/160108/Testing.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **FloQast** 9.1 9.11,181 **Workiva** 8.8 8.81,035 Ease of Use **FloQast** 9.3 9.31,191 **Workiva** 8.7 8.71,781 Ease of Setup **FloQast** 8.9 8.9645 **Workiva** 8.2 8.21,332 Ease of Admin **FloQast** 9.1 9.1445 **Workiva** 8.6 8.6247 Quality of Support **FloQast** 9.4 9.41,059 **Workiva** 8.8 8.8975 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **FloQast** 9.6 9.6440 **Workiva** 9.0 9.0250 Product Direction (% positive) **FloQast** 9.5 9.51,127 **Workiva** 9.0 9.0967 **Features** ratings from reviews Audit Management 7.3 32 7.7 459 Financial Close 7.9 844 8.1 367 FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis) Not enough data 8.8 94 Accounting 7.0 307 Not enough data Budgeting and Forecasting Not enough data 8.6 64 Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting Not enough data 6.8 112 Carbon Accounting Not enough data 8.1 18 Policy Management Not enough data 6.2 31 Financial Reconciliation 7.7 304 Not enough data Sustainability Management Not enough data 8.7 61 Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Not enough data 8.3 77 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 58.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 22.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 58.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 22.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 15.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 28.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 56.2% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 15.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 28.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 56.2% **Reviewers' Industry** [![FloQast](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/78861d3dfdeb104e5b7f6fb16ac800ee/floqast.svg "FloQast")](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews) FloQast Accounting 22.2% Computer Software 11.9% Information Technology and Services 9.0% Financial Services 4.8% Biotechnology 3.0% Other 49.1% [![Workiva](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8845cbdae0f5f9ef98fcde16c1e2f544/workiva-workiva.svg "Workiva")](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews) Workiva Accounting 13.9% Financial Services 9.7% Insurance 5.6% Banking 5.4% Information Technology and Services 5.4% Other 60.1% Alternatives **FloQast Alternatives** ![BlackLine Financial Close Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/9e8d67134dcfec2c155e8e50cb68b578/blackline-blackline-financial-close-management.svg "BlackLine Financial Close Management") [ BlackLine Financial Close... ](/products/blackline-blackline-financial-close-management/reviews) ![Trintech](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/51378a5fa78428aa3f109029c4f142b1/trintech-trintech.svg "Trintech") [ Trintech ](/products/trintech-trintech/reviews) ![Vena](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1dfe2ea86a9d8b17089b0a950f659036/vena.svg "Vena") [ Vena ](/products/vena/reviews) ![OneStream - Unified EPM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/5ec63a5557c29c5994cb79aed3957834/onestream-unified-epm.svg "OneStream - Unified EPM") [ OneStream - Unified EPM ](/products/onestream-unified-epm/reviews) **Workiva Alternatives** ![TeamMate](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/74213e9d3c43a55af352cbe5fd9bab26/teammate.svg "TeamMate") [ TeamMate ](/products/teammate/reviews) ![LogicGate](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_33cc27d36ee3cc5b0fb173768621ff90/logicgate.png "LogicGate") [ LogicGate ](/products/logicgate/reviews) ![Optro](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8097120d5d97da2284759bf528fe5a60/optro.svg "Optro") [ Optro ](/products/optro/reviews) ![Archer](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b09ead1c36668179828abda8c2145ff4/archer-technologies-archer.jpg "Archer") [ Archer ](/products/archer-technologies-archer/reviews) ## FloQast vs Workiva FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between FloQast vs Workiva? FloQast stands out for its higher Ease of Use and Quality of Support scores, while Workiva is more widely adopted in the Enterprise segment and is praised for its collaboration and reporting capabilities. | [FloQast](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews) | [Workiva](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.6/5 (1414 reviews) | 4.5/5 (2147 reviews) | | Mid-Market | Enterprise | | 8.9 | 8.2 | | 9.4 | 8.8 | | Ease of Use (133 all-time mentions) | Collaboration (196 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of FloQast and Workiva compare? FloQast is rated higher for value, with a stronger Price/Cost satisfaction score than Workiva. - **FloQast:** Reviewers describe FloQast as expensive for small teams but generally feel the efficiency and automation benefits justify the investment. - **Workiva:** Workiva is frequently cited as relatively expensive, especially for smaller organizations, with reviewers noting high premium pricing and additional charges for some features. - **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching to FloQast for its automation and efficiency, while Workiva is chosen for its advanced reporting and collaboration features despite higher costs. ### What are the best alternatives to FloQast and Workiva? The top three alternatives to FloQast and Workiva are Optro, BlackLine Financial Close, and TeamMate. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [FloQast](https://www.g2.com/products/floqast/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1414 reviews) | Mid-Market | Expensive for small teams, but valued for efficiency | Ease of Use (133 all-time mentions) | | [Workiva](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews) | 4.5/5 (2147 reviews) | Enterprise | High premium pricing, especially for smaller organizations | Collaboration (196 all-time mentions) | | [Optro](https://www.g2.com/products/optro/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1623 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Automation and integration capabilities | | [BlackLine Financial Close...](https://www.g2.com/products/blackline-blackline-financial-close-management/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1070 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Financial close management | | [TeamMate](https://www.g2.com/products/teammate/reviews) | 4.3/5 (597 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Audit and compliance features | ### Which Accounting features should I prioritize when comparing FloQast and Workiva? Buyers should prioritize Ease of Use, Automation, Integrations, Reporting, and Collaboration when comparing FloQast and Workiva. - **Ease of Use:** FloQast 9.3, Workiva 8.7; 133 all-time mentions for FloQast, 364 for Workiva. - **Automation:** FloQast 34 all-time mentions, Workiva 117 all-time mentions. - **Integrations:** FloQast 41 all-time mentions, Workiva 102 all-time mentions. - **Reporting:** FloQast —, Workiva 151 all-time mentions. - **Collaboration:** FloQast 28 all-time mentions, Workiva 196 all-time mentions. ### What are the pros and cons of FloQast vs Workiva? FloQast's headline strength is ease of use and organization, while Workiva excels in collaboration and reporting. - **FloQast strengths:** Ease of Use (133 all-time mentions), Organization (80), Task Management (80), Reconciliation (60), Efficiency (56), Integrations (41), Automation (34). - **FloQast trade-offs:** Missing Features (34), Limited Functionality (26), high cost for small teams, and some limitations in reporting customization. - **Workiva strengths:** Ease of Use (364 all-time mentions), Collaboration (196), Reporting (151), Features (181), Efficiency (146), Integrations (102), Automation (117), Financial Reporting (96). - **Workiva trade-offs:** Missing Features (113), Learning Curve (85), Learning Difficulty (81), high premium pricing, and some rigidity in customization and formatting. ### Is FloQast or Workiva better for small businesses? FloQast is better suited for small businesses, as indicated by its Mid-Market focus and reviewer sentiment on ease of use and onboarding. - **FloQast:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight quick and intuitive onboarding, user-friendly interface, and suitability for small to medium businesses. - **Workiva:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers note a steeper learning curve and higher cost, making it less ideal for small businesses. ### Which Accounting platform has better integrations? Workiva is favored for integrations, with more reviewer-cited integrations and higher all-time mention counts. - **FloQast:** NetSuite (98 all-time mentions), Dropbox (8 all-time mentions), Microsoft Dynamics (recent reviews). - **Workiva:** Microsoft Excel (12 all-time mentions), NetSuite (7 all-time mentions), Oracle (recent reviews). ### How do FloQast and Workiva compare on customer support? FloQast leads Workiva on Quality of Support by 0.6 points, a material difference in reviewer satisfaction. - **FloQast:** Reviewers consistently praise FloQast's support team as responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive, with a 9.4 Quality of Support score. - **Workiva:** Workiva receives positive feedback for helpful and prompt customer service, but with an 8.8 Quality of Support score, some reviewers note slower response times and reliance on knowledge articles. ### Which is easier to implement, FloQast or Workiva? FloQast is easier to implement than Workiva, with a 0.7-point higher Ease of Setup score. - **FloQast:** Reviewers describe setup as quick, intuitive, and well-supported, with onboarding often completed efficiently and minimal training required. - **Workiva:** Reviewers note a steeper learning curve and more involved initial setup, especially for new users or those unfamiliar with reporting software. ### Which product has better Reporting? Workiva is the stronger choice for Reporting, with higher reviewer-cited mention counts and more advanced reporting features. - **FloQast:** Reporting is cited as an area for improvement, with reviewers noting limited customization and fewer reporting features compared to Workiva. - **Workiva:** Reporting (151 all-time mentions), Financial Reporting (96), Reporting Efficiency (94); reviewers highlight advanced reporting, real-time data linking, and automation as key strengths.