Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Float and Pulse | Cash Flow Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cube
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (74.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$29 per month
Float
Star Rating
(45)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (74.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FloatPulse | Cash Flow Management
Star Rating
(10)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$29 per month
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Pulse | Cash Flow Management excels in its "Historical Data" feature, receiving a perfect score of 10.0, which allows for comprehensive analysis of past cash flows, while Float Cash Flow Forecasting only scores 7.4 in this area, indicating a potential gap in historical insights.
- Reviewers mention that Pulse's "File Exports" feature is rated at 8.7, making it easier to share financial data, whereas Float's lower score of 7.3 suggests that users may find exporting data less efficient or flexible.
- G2 users highlight that Pulse's "Budget Periods" feature scores 9.4, providing robust options for setting up various budgeting timelines, while Float's performance in this area is not as strong, which could limit users' ability to manage budgets effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Float Cash Flow Forecasting shines in "Income and Expenses" tracking with a score of 9.6, slightly outperforming Pulse's 9.3, indicating that Float may offer more detailed insights into financial inflows and outflows.
- Reviewers say that Pulse's "Variance Analysis" feature is rated at 8.7, which helps users understand discrepancies between forecasted and actual figures, while Float's lower score of 7.0 suggests it may not provide as thorough an analysis in this critical area.
- Users report that Float's "Reforecast" capability scores 8.8, indicating a strong ability to adjust forecasts based on new data, while Pulse's score of 7.5 suggests it may not be as responsive to changing financial conditions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Float
No pricing availablePulse | Cash Flow Management
Basics
$29
per month
Just need the basics? This is the plan for you.
- Manage cash flow on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly basis
- Forecast growth with recurring income or expenses that scale automatically
- Works with any currency
Free Trial
Float
Free Trial is available
Pulse | Cash Flow Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
35
9.2
6
Ease of Use
8.7
35
8.9
6
Ease of Setup
8.9
17
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.0
17
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
32
8.6
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
17
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
31
10.0
6
Features by Category
Budget Creation
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
7.9
17
Feature Not Available
9.2
14
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
9.4
18
Feature Not Available
Budget Management
7.4
15
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
Forecasting
8.0
21
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.3
20
Feature Not Available
9.3
20
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
8.4
19
Not enough data
7.5
18
Feature Not Available
8.2
18
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
7.3
5
8.7
5
9.6
8
9.3
5
9.6
8
9.3
5
Cash Flow Forecasting
7.4
7
10.0
5
7.5
6
Not enough data
6.4
6
Feature Not Available
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
7.0
5
8.7
5
7.0
5
9.0
5
7.2
6
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
5
Financial Data Transfer
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
7.2
6
Feature Not Available
7.8
6
Feature Not Available
8.1
7
9.0
5
8.3
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Float and Pulse | Cash Flow Management are categorized as Budgeting and Forecasting and Cash Flow Management
Unique Categories
Float has no unique categories
Pulse | Cash Flow Management has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Float
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Pulse | Cash Flow Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
16.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.6%
Computer Software
9.3%
Retail
4.7%
Design
4.7%
Other
53.5%
Accounting
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
11.1%
Government Administration
11.1%
Entertainment
11.1%
Other
11.1%
Discussions
Float has no discussions with answers
Pulse | Cash Flow Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
