Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flask and web2py 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Flaskweb2py
Star Rating
(12)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about web2pySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Flask excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for developers who appreciate a lightweight framework that allows for quick prototyping. In contrast, web2py has a lower ease of use score of 8.5, which some users find less intuitive for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's flexibility is a significant advantage, allowing developers to choose their tools and libraries, which is ideal for custom applications. On the other hand, web2py offers a more opinionated structure, which some users appreciate for its built-in features but others find limiting.
- G2 users highlight Flask's strong community support and extensive documentation, which contribute to its high quality of support rating of 8.1. Conversely, web2py's support is rated slightly higher at 8.2, but users note that the community is smaller, which can affect the availability of resources.
- Users on G2 report that Flask's product direction is viewed positively by 7.9% of reviewers, indicating a strong roadmap for future development. In contrast, web2py's product direction is rated lower at 6.8%, leading some users to question its long-term viability.
- Reviewers say that Flask's setup process is rated at 8.8, which is generally straightforward, allowing developers to get started quickly. In comparison, web2py's setup is less emphasized in reviews, suggesting that it may not be as seamless for new users.
- Users say that Flask is particularly favored in the small-business segment, with 57.8% of reviews coming from this market, indicating its suitability for startups and small projects. Meanwhile, web2py is more popular in the mid-market segment, with 50% of reviews, suggesting it may cater better to larger applications or teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flask
No pricing availableweb2py
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flask
No trial information availableweb2py
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
42
8.9
11
Ease of Use
9.3
42
8.5
11
Ease of Setup
8.9
16
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
15
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
36
8.2
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
41
6.8
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Flask and web2py are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Flask has no unique categories
web2py has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
web2py
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Legal Services
8.3%
Higher Education
8.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Discussions
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
web2py has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
