Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flask and Tornado 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FlaskTornado
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TornadoSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Flask excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward framework to build web applications. In contrast, Tornado's ease of use score of 7.8 indicates a steeper learning curve, which may deter some users.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's quality of support is rated at 8.1, with many users appreciating the active community and extensive documentation available. Tornado, with a lower support score of 7.5, has been noted by users as having less comprehensive resources, which can lead to challenges when troubleshooting.
- G2 users highlight Flask's strong performance in cloud deployment, allowing for seamless integration with various cloud services. Tornado, while capable, does not have the same level of user satisfaction in this area, with some users reporting difficulties in deployment.
- Users on G2 emphasize Flask's modular architecture, which allows for easy customization and scalability. In contrast, Tornado's architecture is seen as less flexible, which can limit developers looking to implement specific features or changes.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's real-time visibility features are robust, providing developers with immediate insights into application performance. Tornado, while offering some real-time capabilities, does not match the level of detail and user-friendliness that Flask provides.
- Users say that Flask's strong community support and frequent updates contribute to its high ratings in security updates, with many users feeling confident in the framework's ability to address vulnerabilities. Tornado's security update frequency is perceived as less proactive, leading to concerns among some users about potential risks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flask
No pricing availableTornado
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flask
No trial information availableTornado
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
42
8.3
15
Ease of Use
9.3
42
7.8
15
Ease of Setup
8.9
16
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
15
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
36
7.5
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
41
7.5
14
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Modernization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tornado
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Internet
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Retail
5.0%
Other
30.0%
Discussions
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
Tornado has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
