Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flask and Pyramid Software 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FlaskPyramid
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PyramidSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Flask excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for a straightforward framework. In contrast, Pyramid's ease of use score is lower at 7.2, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that Flask has a strong community support system, reflected in its quality of support rating of 8.1. Pyramid, while having decent support, scores lower at 7.5, leading some users to feel less confident in finding help when needed.
- G2 users highlight Flask's ease of setup with a score of 8.8, which many find beneficial for quick project initiation. Pyramid does not have a specific score for setup, but users have noted that it can be more complex to configure initially.
- Reviewers say that Flask's product direction is perceived positively with a score of 7.9, indicating a solid roadmap for future development. In contrast, Pyramid boasts a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that users feel very optimistic about its future enhancements.
- Users on G2 report that Flask is particularly well-suited for small businesses, with 57.8% of reviews coming from this segment, while Pyramid is favored by mid-market users, as indicated by 45.5% of its reviews, showcasing its adaptability to different business sizes.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's overall rating of 4.5 is slightly higher than Pyramid's 4.4, which reflects a general preference among users for Flask's features and usability in real-world applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flask
No pricing availablePyramid
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flask
No trial information availablePyramid
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
42
8.6
6
Ease of Use
9.3
42
7.2
6
Ease of Setup
8.9
16
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
15
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
36
7.5
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
41
10.0
6
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Flask and Pyramid are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Flask has no unique categories
Pyramid has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Pyramid
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Computer Software
27.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Hospital & Health Care
18.2%
Consumer Electronics
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Discussions
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
Pyramid has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
