Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flask and jam.py 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Flaskjam.py
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about jam.pySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Flask excels in its flexibility and modularity, allowing developers to easily integrate various extensions, while jam.py is praised for its out-of-the-box features that cater specifically to enterprise needs.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's ease of setup is slightly lower than jam.py, with a score of 8.8 compared to jam.py's impressive 9.8, indicating that jam.py may be more user-friendly for those new to web development.
- G2 users highlight that Flask has a strong community support system, which is beneficial for troubleshooting and finding resources, whereas jam.py's support is noted to be slightly less robust, with a quality of support rating of 8.0.
- Users on G2 report that Flask's product direction is perceived as less favorable, with a score of 7.9, while jam.py boasts a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that jam.py is seen as having a clearer and more promising roadmap for future development.
- Reviewers say that Flask is particularly well-suited for small businesses, with 57.8% of reviews coming from this segment, while jam.py is favored by enterprises, as indicated by 63.6% of its reviews, highlighting the different target audiences for each product.
- Users say that while both products have a high star rating of 4.5, Flask's total number of reviews (45) suggests a more established user base compared to jam.py's 11 reviews, which may indicate a newer or less widely adopted solution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flask
No pricing availablejam.py
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flask
No trial information availablejam.py
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
42
8.7
10
Ease of Use
9.3
42
8.8
10
Ease of Setup
8.9
16
9.8
8
Ease of Admin
8.7
15
9.7
5
Quality of Support
8.1
36
8.0
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
41
10.0
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Flask and jam.py are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Flask has no unique categories
jam.py has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
jam.py
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Computer Software
27.3%
Education Management
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Oil & Energy
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Discussions
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
jam.py has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
