Compare Fingerprint and IPQS 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
No pricing available
Fingerprint
Star Rating
(361)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansIPQS
Star Rating
(113)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IPQSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Fingerprint excels in ease of setup, with many users highlighting how the clear documentation and quick initial setup process made integration seamless. In contrast, while IPQS is praised for its speed and accuracy, some users have noted that it can be more complex to configure initially.
- Users say that Fingerprint provides a more consistent and reliable identification process compared to traditional methods, which is particularly beneficial for real-time fraud detection. IPQS, on the other hand, is recognized for its robust capabilities in detecting VPNs and residential proxies, making it a strong choice for those focused on fraud prevention.
- Reviewers mention that Fingerprint's wide range of SDKs, including support for mobile platforms like Flutter, enhances its usability for developers. Meanwhile, IPQS users appreciate its deep analytical capabilities, which help in eliminating fake chargebacks and improving transaction security.
- According to verified reviews, both products receive high marks for their quality of support, but Fingerprint edges out slightly with a higher satisfaction score. Users of IPQS commend its fast reaction times and dependability, which are crucial for businesses needing quick fraud assessments.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while both products are well-suited for small businesses, Fingerprint has a broader user base and more recent reviews, indicating a more active and engaged community. IPQS, while effective, has fewer recent reviews, which may suggest less ongoing user engagement.
- Users report that IPQS is particularly effective for those needing detailed fraud detection metrics, with features that allow for comprehensive analysis of potential threats. In contrast, Fingerprint is favored for its user-friendly interface and minimal friction during user authentication, making it ideal for enhancing user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Fingerprint
Free
Free
Per Month
Our Free plan includes:
- 14 day free trial of Pro Plus plan
- Fingerprint Identification
- Android Smart Signals
IPQS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Fingerprint
Free Trial is available
IPQS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
220
9.1
111
Ease of Use
9.4
241
9.2
111
Ease of Setup
9.2
224
8.8
84
Ease of Admin
9.3
123
9.1
77
Quality of Support
9.4
188
9.1
107
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
122
9.3
77
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
213
9.3
110
Features by Category
Detection
Feature Not Available
9.1
75
8.8
137
9.0
59
8.8
127
8.7
82
Feature Not Available
8.8
75
Analysis
8.9
134
8.7
78
8.4
115
8.6
79
Feature Not Available
8.7
75
Administration
8.8
136
9.2
83
Feature Not Available
8.7
74
Feature Not Available
9.0
75
Agentic AI - Fraud Detection
8.8
82
Not enough data
7.6
50
Not enough data
8.2
60
Not enough data
Trading
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.9
18
Threat Detection
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Blocking
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.3
15
Agentic AI - Click Fraud
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.7
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Agentic AI - Email Verification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics - Phone Verification
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Additional Features - Phone Verification
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
9.3
17
Agentic AI - Phone Verification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Intelligence
Feature Not Available
9.3
25
Feature Not Available
9.0
28
8.6
44
9.1
26
8.8
53
9.7
26
Detection
8.9
57
9.5
28
Feature Not Available
9.5
26
8.6
48
9.5
26
Response
9.2
60
9.4
18
8.2
46
9.2
26
Feature Not Available
9.3
25
8.6
49
8.9
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fingerprint and IPQS are categorized as Fraud Detection and E-commerce Fraud Protection
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fingerprint
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IPQS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
19.6%
Computer Software
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
11.0%
Marketing and Advertising
5.7%
Banking
2.9%
Other
44.1%
Apparel & Fashion
17.9%
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Computer Software
15.2%
Marketing and Advertising
11.6%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
33.0%
Discussions
Fingerprint has no discussions with answers
IPQS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
