Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FindBugs and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
FindBugs
Star Rating
(22)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FindBugsSonarQube
Star Rating
(128)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to FindBugs. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, especially when using Kubernetes, which makes it easy to integrate into existing workflows.
- Users say that SonarQube's integration with GitHub is seamless, allowing developers to run scans effortlessly. This feature enhances productivity by providing real-time code suggestions that help improve code quality and security.
- Reviewers mention that while FindBugs is a reliable tool for detecting defects in Java code, it lacks the modern integrations and user-friendly features that SonarQube offers. Users have noted its effectiveness in identifying potential issues, but some feel it doesn't match the ease of use that SonarQube provides.
- According to verified reviews, SonarQube has a much larger user base, with 124 reviews compared to FindBugs' 20. This higher volume of feedback suggests that SonarQube's features and support are more widely recognized and appreciated in the developer community.
- Users highlight that SonarQube not only meets their requirements but also provides a better overall experience with its intuitive onboarding and setup processes. In contrast, FindBugs, while effective, may not offer the same level of support and ease during implementation.
- Reviewers note that both tools have their strengths, with SonarQube receiving praise for its quality of support and ongoing product direction, while FindBugs is recognized for its ability to detect specific coding issues. However, SonarQube's higher ratings in these areas indicate a more robust partnership for users looking for long-term solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FindBugs
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
FindBugs
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
10
8.8
110
Ease of Use
8.3
10
8.5
113
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.1
72
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
64
Quality of Support
8.1
8
8.2
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.4
58
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
8.6
107
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
7.1
33
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FindBugs and SonarQube are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
FindBugs has no unique categories
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bug Tracking, Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FindBugs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Banking
10.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Research
5.0%
Other
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
27.0%
Computer Software
21.4%
Financial Services
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
FindBugs has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
