Link copied to clipboard # FindBugs vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/findbugs/opentext-static-application-security-testing/export.csv) FindBugsOpenText Static Application...[+ Add Product](#) Reviews **FindBugs** [ 4.5/5(22) ](https://www.g2.com/products/findbugs/reviews#reviews) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** [ 4.5/5(24) ](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews#reviews) Pricing **FindBugs** No pricing available **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **FindBugs** Not enough reviews yet **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Not enough reviews yet Return on Investment **FindBugs** Not enough reviews yet **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Not enough reviews yet Perceived Cost **FindBugs** Not enough reviews yet **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** $$$$$ Average Discount **FindBugs** Not enough reviews yet **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Not enough reviews yet Pros & Cons **FindBugs** Not enough data **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** [ Easy Integrations (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1997535&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Integrations (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1997526&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ False Positives (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1997517&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Ratings Meets Requirements **FindBugs** 8.5 8.510 **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.3 8.315 Ease of Use **FindBugs** 8.3 8.310 **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.7 8.715 Ease of Setup **FindBugs** Not enough data **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.3 8.39 Ease of Admin **FindBugs** Not enough data **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.1 8.19 Quality of Support **FindBugs** 8.1 8.18 **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.7 8.715 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **FindBugs** Not enough data **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 8.5 8.59 Product Direction (% positive) **FindBugs** 8.7 8.79 **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 9.1 9.113 Features Static Application Security Testing (SAST)[Hide 23 FeaturesShow 23 Features](javascript:void(0);) Not enough data 8.1 13 Administration API / Integrations Not enough data 8.9(won by default) 9 Extensibility Not enough data 8.7(won by default) 10 Analysis Real-Time Analytics Not enough data 8.3(won by default) 11 Issue Tracking Not enough data 8.0(won by default) 11 Static Code Analysis Not enough data 8.8(won by default) 11 Code Analysis Not enough data 8.5(won by default) 10 Integrated Development Environment Not enough data Not enough data Testing Command-Line Tools Not enough data 8.1(won by default) 9 Manual Testing Not enough data 6.9(won by default) 9 Test Automation Not enough data 8.7(won by default) 10 Compliance Testing Not enough data 8.5(won by default) 8 Source-Code Scanning Not enough data 7.0(won by default) 9 Detection Rate Not enough data 8.3(won by default) 9 False Positives Not enough data 6.2(won by default) 11 Multi-Language Scanning Not enough data Not enough data Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Autonomous Task Execution Not enough data Not enough data Additional Functionality Debugging Not enough data Not enough data Generative AI Not enough data Not enough data AI Copilot Not enough data Not enough data For Developers Not enough data Not enough data Deployment Management Not enough data Not enough data Application Security Not enough data Not enough data Dashboard Not enough data Not enough data Show 1 feature category with incomplete data Static Code Analysis[Hide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features](javascript:void(0);) Not enough data Not enough data Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis Adaptive Learning Not enough data Not enough data Natural Language Interaction Not enough data Not enough data Proactive Assistance Not enough data Not enough data User Insights Reviewers' Company Size [![FindBugs](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6a5c9abd612e12fc0816e9dbcf7b8477/findbugs.png "FindBugs")](https://www.g2.com/products/findbugs/reviews) FindBugs Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 35.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 40.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 25.0% [![OpenText Static Application Security Testing](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2b4f4de47adee5040ae421fc276784e9/opentext-static-application-security-testing.svg "OpenText Static Application Security Testing")](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) OpenText Static Application Security Testing Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 28.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 47.6% Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) 35.0% 28.6% Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 40.0% 23.8% Enterprise (\> 1000 emp.) 25.0% 47.6% Reviewers' Industry [![FindBugs](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6a5c9abd612e12fc0816e9dbcf7b8477/findbugs.png "FindBugs")](https://www.g2.com/products/findbugs/reviews) FindBugs Computer Software 35.0% Information Technology and Services 20.0% Banking 10.0% Telecommunications 5.0% Research 5.0% Other 25.0% [![OpenText Static Application Security Testing](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2b4f4de47adee5040ae421fc276784e9/opentext-static-application-security-testing.svg "OpenText Static Application Security Testing")](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) OpenText Static Application Security Testing Financial Services 23.8% Banking 19.0% Information Technology and Services 14.3% Computer Software 14.3% Computer & Network Security 9.5% Other 19.0% FAQs ## FindBugs vs OpenText Static Application... FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 17, 2026 ### What is the difference between FindBugs vs OpenText Static Application...? FindBugs and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are both highly rated static code analysis tools, but OpenText Static Application Security Testing stands out for broader language support and higher support satisfaction. | [FindBugs](https://www.g2.com/products/findbugs/reviews) | [OpenText Static Application Security Testing](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.5/5 (22 reviews) | 4.5/5 (24 reviews) | | — | — | | — | 8.3 | | 8.1 | 8.7 | | Superb at finding defects in Java code | Supports 34+ languages and strong integration capabilities | ### How do the pricing models of FindBugs and OpenText Static Application... compare? OpenText Static Application Security Testing is rated higher for value, with a stronger Price/Cost satisfaction score than FindBugs. - **FindBugs:** Reviewers appreciate that it is free and easy to use, but some mention the need for more features and improved reporting. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing:** Reviewers note the product is "a bit high" in price but highlight its extensive language support and integration capabilities as justifying the cost. ### What are the best alternatives to FindBugs and OpenText Static Application...? The top three alternatives to FindBugs and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are SonarQube, Gearset DevOps, and Black Duck Coverity Static. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [FindBugs](https://www.g2.com/products/findbugs/reviews) | 4.5/5 (22) | — | Superb at finding defects in Java code | | [OpenText Static Application Security Testing](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) | 4.5/5 (24) | "A bit high" in price, but justified by features | Supports 34+ languages and strong integration capabilities | | [SonarQube](https://www.g2.com/products/sonarqube/reviews) | 4.4/5 (155) | — | — | | [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) | 4.7/5 (305) | — | — | | [Black Duck Coverity Static](https://www.g2.com/products/black-duck-coverity-static/reviews) | 4.3/5 (65) | — | — | ### Which Static Code Analysis features should I prioritize when comparing FindBugs and OpenText Static Application...? Buyers should prioritize language support, integration capabilities, reporting quality, ease of use, and support experience when comparing FindBugs and OpenText Static Application Security Testing. - **Language support:** OpenText Static Application Security Testing supports 34+ languages, while FindBugs is focused on Java. - **Integration capabilities:** OpenText Static Application Security Testing is frequently cited for strong integration with CI/CD and IDEs; FindBugs is noted for easy IDE integration but has lost Jenkins support in recent releases. - **Reporting quality:** FindBugs reviewers mention "old school" reporting and desire for more detailed explanations; OpenText Static Application Security Testing is praised for an organized dashboard and reporting platform. - **Ease of use:** FindBugs scores 8.3, OpenText Static Application Security Testing scores 8.7 on Ease of Use. - **Support experience:** FindBugs scores 8.1, OpenText Static Application Security Testing scores 8.7 on Quality of Support. ### What are the pros and cons of FindBugs vs OpenText Static Application...? FindBugs is strongest for Java code analysis and ease of use, while OpenText Static Application Security Testing excels in language coverage and integration capabilities. - **FindBugs strengths:** Superb at finding defects in Java code, easy IDE integration, quick analysis, low false positives, free to use. - **FindBugs trade-offs:** Reporting is "old school" and could be improved, lacks support for languages beyond Java, lost Jenkins support in new releases, some reviewers desire more detailed explanations and features. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing strengths:** Supports 34+ languages, strong integration with CI/CD and IDEs, organized dashboard, detailed reporting, high reviewer satisfaction with support and ease of use. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing trade-offs:** Higher price sentiment, some false positives, setup can be complex, performance can be slow with large codebases. ### Is FindBugs or OpenText Static Application... better for small businesses? OpenText Static Application Security Testing is better suited for small businesses based on higher Ease of Use and Quality of Support scores. - **FindBugs:** No segment data available; reviewers highlight ease of use and free access, but note limited language support and dated reporting. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing:** No segment data available; reviewers cite broad language support, strong integrations, and higher satisfaction with support and usability. ### Which Static Code Analysis platform has better integrations? OpenText Static Application Security Testing is favored for integrations, with reviewers highlighting its broad integration capabilities. - **FindBugs:** Reviewers mention easy IDE integration and previous Jenkins support, but no recent integration themes are cited. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing:** Reviewers cite integrations with CI/CD pipelines and IDEs such as IntelliJ, Visual Studio, and Android Studio, with 1 all-time mention each for "Easy Integrations," "Integrations," and "Integration Support." ### How do FindBugs and OpenText Static Application... compare on customer support? OpenText Static Application Security Testing leads on Quality of Support with a 0.6-point advantage over FindBugs (8.7 vs 8.1). - **FindBugs:** Reviewers appreciate the tool's utility but mention a desire for more detailed documentation and improved reporting. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing:** Reviewers consistently praise the support experience, citing detailed documentation, good training, and responsive technical support. ### Which is easier to implement, FindBugs or OpenText Static Application...? OpenText Static Application Security Testing is rated 8.3 for Ease of Setup, while FindBugs has no available score for this dimension. - **FindBugs:** Reviewers describe manual integration and configuration, with some effort required for visual customization and initial setup. - **OpenText Static Application Security Testing:** Reviewers note setup can be complex but highlight available documentation and training; Ease of Setup scores range from 4.0 to 7.0 in individual reviews, with an average of 8.3. Alternatives **FindBugs Alternatives** ![SonarQube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2d6b80be24e9f51c144f780f2aa41cb3/sonarqube.svg "SonarQube") [ SonarQube ](/products/sonarqube/reviews) ![Gearset DevOps](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/9e76ec4e5f61a21488651446ec8e33c8/gearset-devops.svg "Gearset DevOps") [ Gearset DevOps ](/products/gearset-devops/reviews) ![Aikido Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/281b7973f3fd54aeeba3bec666fa4da6/aikido-security.svg "Aikido Security") [ Aikido Security ](/products/aikido-security/reviews) ![Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ee46b61b130757d24b7633fe98e00fb6/checkmarx.svg "Checkmarx") [ Checkmarx ](/products/checkmarx/reviews) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives** ![SonarQube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2d6b80be24e9f51c144f780f2aa41cb3/sonarqube.svg "SonarQube") [ SonarQube ](/products/sonarqube/reviews) ![Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ee46b61b130757d24b7633fe98e00fb6/checkmarx.svg "Checkmarx") [ Checkmarx ](/products/checkmarx/reviews) ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub") [ GitHub ](/products/github/reviews) ![Semgrep](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1e7a6e6a67aa276a2da4cfd90e817e9f/semgrep.svg "Semgrep") [ Semgrep ](/products/semgrep/reviews) ## FindBugs vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing - Reviewers felt that FindBugs meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Static Application Security Testing. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Static Application Security Testing is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Static Application Security Testing over FindBugs.