Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FindBugs and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FindBugs
Star Rating
(22)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FindBugsOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that FindBugs excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.0, making it easier for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflows, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, although robust, does not provide the same level of integration flexibility.
- Users report that FindBugs has a strong Static Code Analysis capability with a score of 8.7, which helps in identifying potential bugs early in the development process, whereas OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, while effective, received a slightly lower score of 8.3 in this area.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer shines in Quality of Support with a score of 8.6, indicating that users feel well-supported, while FindBugs scored 8.1, suggesting there may be room for improvement in customer service.
- Users on G2 mention that FindBugs has a more user-friendly Ease of Use rating of 8.3 compared to OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer's 8.7, indicating that while both are relatively easy to use, OpenText may have a slight edge in user experience.
- Reviewers say that FindBugs has a lower False Positives rate with a score of 6.5, which can be a significant concern for developers, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer's performance in this area is not as favorable, leading to potential distractions during the coding process.
- Users report that FindBugs is particularly strong in Test Automation with a score of 8.5, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to streamline their testing processes, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, although capable, does not match this level of automation efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FindBugs
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
FindBugs
No trial information availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
10
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.3
10
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.1
8
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Testing
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FindBugs and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
FindBugs has no unique categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FindBugs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Banking
10.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Research
5.0%
Other
25.0%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
FindBugs has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
