Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Files.com and IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
JSCAPE MFT Server
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cerberus FTP Server
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
No pricing available
Files.com
Star Rating
(260)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansIBM Sterling B2B Integrator
Star Rating
(41)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Sterling B2B IntegratorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that Files.com excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it user-friendly for teams of all sizes, while IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, with a score of 8.0, is noted for having a steeper learning curve, particularly for new users.
- Users report that Files.com offers superior quality of support, scoring 9.5, with many reviewers highlighting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator's support, rated at 7.3, has received feedback about slower response times and less effective resolutions.
- Reviewers mention that Files.com provides robust compliance features, scoring 9.4, which is particularly beneficial for industries with strict regulatory requirements. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, while still strong at 8.9, is seen as less comprehensive in this area, leading to concerns for some users about meeting compliance standards.
- Users on G2 highlight Files.com’s strong application integration capabilities, scoring 9.2, which allows seamless connectivity with various third-party applications. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, with a score of 8.8, is also capable but has been noted to require more manual configuration for integrations.
- G2 users report that Files.com shines in file transfer acceleration, achieving a score of 9.3, which significantly enhances performance for large file transfers. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, while rated at 8.8, does not match the speed and efficiency that Files.com offers in this regard.
- Users say that Files.com’s encryption features are top-notch, scoring 9.4, providing peace of mind for data security. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, with a score of 8.8, offers solid encryption but lacks some of the advanced options that Files.com provides, which can be a deciding factor for security-conscious organizations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Files.com
Files.com
Free Trial
Join over 4,000 companies who trust Files.com for Secure File Orchestration. Your 7 Day Free Trial Includes:
- Full access to the entire Files.com platform, including all integrations, automations, protocols, and APIs
- Unlimited access to the industry's best support and onboarding team (we're rated #1 on G2)
- All the transfer, storage, and API calls that you need for your PoC and trial testing
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator
No pricing availableFree Trial
Files.com
Free Trial is available
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
220
8.6
24
Ease of Use
9.3
226
7.9
25
Ease of Setup
9.4
201
8.0
17
Ease of Admin
9.3
180
7.9
17
Quality of Support
9.5
189
7.4
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
176
8.7
17
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
206
8.4
22
Features by Category
Data Delivery
Feature Not Available
8.9
14
|
Verified
9.0
88
8.8
13
|
Verified
9.1
84
8.7
13
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.2
14
|
Verified
Functionality
8.7
84
7.7
13
|
Verified
9.4
89
8.9
14
|
Verified
9.1
86
7.8
13
|
Verified
8.4
87
7.7
14
|
Verified
Governance
8.8
88
8.5
13
|
Verified
9.3
86
8.6
13
|
Verified
9.5
87
9.2
14
|
Verified
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Feature Not Available
8.9
14
|
Verified
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
9.4
89
8.9
14
|
Verified
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
88
8.5
13
|
Verified
9.3
86
8.6
13
|
Verified
9.5
87
9.2
14
|
Verified
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
6.8
19
Not enough data
6.8
19
Not enough data
6.9
19
Not enough data
7.4
19
Not enough data
Management
9.5
160
Not enough data
9.3
145
Not enough data
9.0
131
Not enough data
9.4
154
Not enough data
Functionality
9.7
160
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
9.1
125
Not enough data
8.5
117
Not enough data
Security
9.3
139
Not enough data
9.5
152
Not enough data
9.5
154
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
9.2
20
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Management
8.2
12
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Security
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
9.7
11
Not enough data
Integration Options
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.7
11
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
Deployment
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Files.com and IBM Sterling B2B Integrator are categorized as Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories
Files.com is categorized as File Transfer Protocol (FTP) and iPaaS
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator is categorized as Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Files.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
10.3%
Information Technology and Services
9.9%
Hospital & Health Care
9.5%
Financial Services
5.5%
Retail
4.0%
Other
60.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
15.2%
Banking
12.1%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
9.1%
Pharmaceuticals
6.1%
Other
39.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
How good is files com?
2 Comments
FL
It's good.Read more
What is Brickftp?
2 Comments
KJ
BrickFTP is the former name of files.com. Same company. New name (as of a few years ago).Read more
How to use file com?
2 Comments
BB
I had to leave files.com because they raised their rates exponentially (as they all do once they think you have too much data there to switch). L8r!Read more
What is the latest version of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator?
1 Comment
PP
We are using sterling v5.2Read more
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
