Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Figma and Wondershare Mockitt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Anima
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Figma
Star Rating
(1,373)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FigmaWondershare Mockitt
Star Rating
(15)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Wondershare MockittSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Figma excels in collaboration features, allowing multiple users to work on designs in real-time directly in the browser. This capability is particularly praised for its ease of use, as users can inspect components and check design elements without needing to install heavy software.
- Users say that Wondershare Mockitt is highly intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for new users to start creating prototypes and mind maps quickly. The software's straightforward interface is highlighted as a significant advantage, enabling users to integrate their ideas seamlessly.
- Reviewers mention that Figma's overall quality and satisfaction metrics are significantly higher, reflecting a strong preference among users for its robust features and collaborative capabilities. The platform's ability to facilitate teamwork is a standout feature that many find invaluable.
- According to verified reviews, Wondershare Mockitt offers a solid user experience with its ease of implementation, which is often noted as a key factor for users looking to get started quickly. However, it may not match the depth of features that Figma provides for more complex design needs.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while Figma has a slightly lower score in ease of use compared to Mockitt, its comprehensive toolset and collaborative features make it a preferred choice for teams working on intricate design projects.
- Users report that Figma's support quality is generally higher, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, while Wondershare Mockitt's support is considered good, it does not receive the same level of acclaim, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Figma
No pricing availableWondershare Mockitt
No pricing availableFree Trial
Figma
No trial information availableWondershare Mockitt
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
1,074
8.9
14
Ease of Use
9.0
1,081
9.4
14
Ease of Setup
9.2
380
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.6
155
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
808
8.2
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
142
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
1,026
9.2
14
Features by Category
Platform Basics
8.8
380
9.4
12
8.8
379
8.0
11
8.8
375
9.0
12
9.2
394
9.3
12
Platform Additional Functionality
9.1
388
9.0
12
7.6
330
7.8
12
8.8
374
8.8
12
8.6
370
9.3
12
Agentic AI - Prototyping
7.5
55
Not enough data
7.6
53
Not enough data
7.8
51
Not enough data
7.5
54
Not enough data
7.4
52
Not enough data
Platform Basics
8.6
376
Not enough data
9.0
392
Not enough data
8.7
368
Not enough data
8.7
365
Not enough data
9.0
381
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
8.9
374
Not enough data
8.8
374
Not enough data
8.8
372
Not enough data
Platform Basics
9.0
343
Not enough data
8.8
332
Not enough data
8.5
330
Not enough data
8.8
328
Not enough data
8.7
331
Not enough data
8.9
337
Not enough data
Platform Basics - Software Design Platforms
8.4
72
Not enough data
8.6
73
Not enough data
8.0
72
Not enough data
9.1
74
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
9.3
347
Not enough data
9.2
345
Not enough data
8.8
330
Not enough data
7.9
301
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality - Software Design Platforms
9.1
74
Not enough data
8.7
72
Not enough data
8.8
71
Not enough data
8.8
72
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Figma and Wondershare Mockitt are categorized as Prototyping
Unique Categories
Figma is categorized as Wireframing and Software Design Platforms
Wondershare Mockitt has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Figma
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Wondershare Mockitt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
20.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Design
15.5%
Marketing and Advertising
6.9%
Financial Services
5.0%
Other
35.8%
Manufacturing
46.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
13.3%
Marketing and Advertising
13.3%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.7%
Computer Software
6.7%
Other
13.3%
Discussions
What is Figma used for?
8 Comments
DF
UX/UI designing, prototyping, wireframing. Really easy UI and cloud-based. Read more
Is Figma a free software?
7 Comments
RS
Figma has a limited free plan. For more complex projects a premium plan would be needed though as you may need multiple pages. Figma makes it easy to share...Read more
Should I use Figma?
6 Comments
SK
Figma is a fantastic collaboration tool that will assist you in working as a team and easily identifying who is working on what. The prototyping...Read more
Wondershare Mockitt has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
