Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FFmpeg and Videojs 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (64.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FFmpeg
Star Rating
(20)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FFmpegVideojs
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (64.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about VideojsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Videojs excels in ease of use with a score of 8.1, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize a user-friendly interface, while FFmpeg's lower score of 6.9 indicates a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Videojs has a strong focus on video playback features, particularly its customizable player and support for various video formats, which enhances user experience significantly compared to FFmpeg's more technical approach to video processing.
- G2 users highlight that FFmpeg shines in its powerful video encoding capabilities, with a score of 9.5 for meeting requirements, making it ideal for users who need advanced video manipulation, whereas Videojs scores lower at 8.5 in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Videojs has a more straightforward setup process, which is reflected in its higher ease of setup rating, while FFmpeg's complexity can lead to longer setup times, as noted by several reviewers.
- Reviewers say that Videojs provides better quality of support with a score of 7.7, as users appreciate the responsive community and documentation, whereas FFmpeg's support is often described as lacking, with a score of 6.9.
- Users mention that FFmpeg's product direction is viewed positively by 8.6% of reviewers, indicating a strong commitment to ongoing development and feature enhancements, while Videojs's lower score of 6.8 suggests some users feel less confident about its future updates.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FFmpeg
No pricing availableVideojs
No pricing availableFree Trial
FFmpeg
No trial information availableVideojs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
17
8.5
13
Ease of Use
6.9
17
8.1
13
Ease of Setup
7.4
7
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
6.9
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.9
9
7.7
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
17
6.8
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FFmpeg and Videojs are categorized as Other Video
Unique Categories
FFmpeg has no unique categories
Videojs has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FFmpeg
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Videojs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Computer Software
15.8%
Media Production
10.5%
Marketing and Advertising
10.5%
Semiconductors
5.3%
Other
42.1%
Computer Software
57.1%
Marketing and Advertising
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Investment Management
7.1%
Higher Education
7.1%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Why do you need FFmpeg?
1 Comment
AT
I have more options and control on video compression, especially when small file sizes are really needed.Read more
FFmpeg has no more discussions with answers
Videojs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
