Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Fauna and ScyllaDB

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Fauna
Fauna
Star Rating
(25)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
0
Learn more about Fauna
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(361)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDB
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that ScyllaDB excels in handling large volumes of data without performance issues, making it particularly suitable for applications like AI model training. Users appreciate its high throughput and low latency, which allows for quick read and write operations even under heavy workloads.
  • Users say that Fauna's serverless architecture and global consistency are standout features, particularly for developers looking for ease of use. The ability to write TypeScript-like queries and reduce round-trip queries enhances the development experience, allowing for more efficient data management.
  • Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's performance remains robust even during peak usage, with many noting that it outperforms traditional databases like MongoDB in terms of speed and latency. This reliability is a significant advantage for businesses that require consistent performance.
  • According to verified reviews, Fauna's focus on simplifying database operations is appreciated by developers. Users highlight that it alleviates the complexities often associated with relational databases, allowing them to focus more on development rather than database management.
  • G2 reviewers indicate that while ScyllaDB has a slightly lower score in support quality compared to Fauna, it still provides valuable resources for users. However, Fauna's higher support ratings suggest that users may find more responsive assistance when facing challenges.
  • Users report that ScyllaDB's scalability is a major plus, with many praising its ability to handle growing data needs seamlessly. In contrast, while Fauna also offers scalability, some users feel that its serverless model may not be as flexible for certain high-demand scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Fauna
Generous Daily Free Tier!
0
Learn more about Fauna
ScyllaDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Fauna
Free Trial is available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
15
8.8
305
Ease of Use
7.6
17
8.6
314
Ease of Setup
8.2
11
8.3
223
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.9
12
8.5
285
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
13
9.1
297
Features by Category
8.9
8
Not enough data
Management
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Support
5.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Security
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Database Features
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
160
Data Management
Not enough data
8.7
147
Not enough data
8.7
152
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
148
Not enough data
8.6
146
Not enough data
8.7
146
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
141
Security
Not enough data
8.3
135
Not enough data
8.5
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.5
135
Support
Not enough data
8.5
131
Not enough data
8.5
136
8.4
6
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Performance
9.3
5
Not enough data
Security
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Support
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Wide Column DatabaseHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
8.3
76
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
67
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
72
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
71
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Database as a Service (DBaaS)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
8.2
11
8.8
154
Configuration
8.8
11
9.2
147
8.3
11
8.8
140
7.9
11
8.9
144
7.0
11
8.4
135
8.3
11
8.7
136
Database Administration
8.5
10
8.8
136
8.2
10
8.7
131
7.8
10
8.7
132
Availability
9.3
10
9.4
145
8.7
10
8.8
142
8.5
10
8.9
135
9.1
11
8.8
141
Security
7.5
10
8.7
122
8.7
9
8.6
123
7.2
9
8.7
124
Data Management
8.8
10
8.9
132
6.3
9
8.7
126
8.9
8
Not enough data
Database Features
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fauna
Fauna
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Fauna and ScyllaDB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fauna
Fauna
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
64.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
12.0%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
40.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
29.7%
Reviewers' Industry
Fauna
Fauna
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Education Management
16.0%
Computer Software
16.0%
Consulting
4.0%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Other
40.0%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Computer Software
29.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.6%
Financial Services
5.7%
Banking
3.7%
Education Management
3.4%
Other
44.9%
Alternatives
Fauna
Fauna Alternatives
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
Add MongoDB Atlas
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
MongoDB
MongoDB
Add MongoDB
Oracle Database
Oracle Database
Add Oracle Database
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Alternatives
Cassandra
Cassandra
Add Cassandra
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
Redis Software
Redis Software
Add Redis Software
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Add Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Discussions
Fauna
Fauna Discussions
Is FaunaDB serverless?
3 Comments
Soumya Ranjan M.
SM
Yes it is. Learn more about this on their website: https://fauna.com/serverlessRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Fauna has no more discussions with answers
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Discussions
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
Peter C.
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x • Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator) • Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers