Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Fauna and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuestDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0
Free
Fauna
Star Rating
(25)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
0
Learn more about FaunaNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 9.3, allowing for complex relationships and structures, while Fauna's data model score of 7.7 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language is highly intuitive, scoring 8.6, which facilitates easier data retrieval compared to Fauna's query language, which also scores 8.6 but lacks some of the advanced features that Neo4j offers.
- G2 users highlight that Fauna shines in security features, with a score of 8.9 for data encryption and role-based authorization, while Neo4j's security features score lower at 6.8, indicating potential vulnerabilities.
- Users on G2 report that Neo4j has superior performance in query optimization, scoring 7.3, which is crucial for applications requiring fast data access, whereas Fauna's performance in this area is less impressive.
- Reviewers mention that Fauna's availability and scalability are standout features, both scoring 9.2, making it a strong choice for businesses expecting rapid growth, while Neo4j's scalability score of 7.9 suggests it may face challenges in high-demand environments.
- Users say that Neo4j's ease of setup is a significant advantage, scoring 8.8, which is higher than Fauna's score of 8.3, indicating that users may find Neo4j easier to implement in their systems.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Neo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
Fauna
Free Trial is available
Neo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
15
8.5
73
Ease of Use
7.6
17
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
8.2
11
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.9
12
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
13
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Support
5.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Security
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Database Features
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Performance
9.3
5
Not enough data
Security
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Support
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Configuration
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
Availability
9.3
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Security
7.5
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
6.3
9
Not enough data
Database Features
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fauna and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Graph Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fauna
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Education Management
16.0%
Computer Software
16.0%
Consulting
4.0%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Other
40.0%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is FaunaDB serverless?
3 Comments
SM
Yes it is.
Learn more about this on their website: https://fauna.com/serverlessRead more
Fauna has no more discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What are some of the benefits provided by the neo4j DBMS?
1 Comment
SS
Very easy to grow database schema over timeRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
