Compare F5 NGINX and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
No pricing available
F5 NGINX
Star Rating
(107)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plansImperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Star Rating
(41)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)F5 NGINX vs Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
- Reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) meets the needs of their business better than F5 NGINX.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) over F5 NGINX.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
F5 NGINX
NGINX Plus, Single Instance
Starting at $2500
per year
24/7 Enterprise support with 30-minute SLA is available, for $5,000/year per instance.
We also provide Basic support for $2,500/year and Professional support for $3,500/year for less-critical deployments.
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
No pricing availableFree Trial
F5 NGINX
Free Trial is available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
96
9.5
36
Ease of Use
8.4
96
9.3
35
Ease of Setup
8.3
65
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.4
65
9.1
17
Quality of Support
7.6
70
9.0
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
45
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
93
9.3
33
Features by Category
Analysis
9.4
21
9.3
28
8.9
20
8.9
28
9.1
20
9.3
29
Controls
8.4
21
9.2
26
9.0
21
9.0
29
8.3
20
9.3
30
Functionality
8.2
18
9.1
26
8.1
21
9.2
28
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Protection
8.1
21
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
Resolution
7.1
23
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Data Management
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
User Features
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Modernization
8.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
F5 NGINX and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
F5 NGINX is categorized as Load Balancing, Container Networking, Web Server Accelerator, Application Server, and DDoS Protection
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
F5 NGINX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
38.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Internet
7.5%
Banking
2.8%
E-Learning
2.8%
Other
31.1%
Information Technology and Services
38.5%
Retail
12.8%
Banking
10.3%
Financial Services
5.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.1%
Other
28.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Improve the delivery of static resources
3 Comments
MB
Application serverRead more
F5 NGINX has no more discussions with answers
Is imperva a Web application firewall?
1 Comment
VM
Yes, Imperva is a well-known provider of web application firewall (WAF) solutions. Imperva offers a Web Application Firewall product, known as Imperva WAF,...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
