Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare F5 NGINX and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX
Star Rating
(107)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Star Rating
(41)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that F5 NGINX excels in performance and reliability, with a score of 9.5, making it a strong choice for organizations that prioritize speed and uptime. In contrast, Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) follows closely with a score of 9.4, indicating solid performance but slightly less emphasis on reliability.
  • Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX's logging and reporting features are robust, scoring 9.3, which helps teams maintain visibility over their applications. However, Imperva WAF outshines in this area with a score of 9.4, indicating more comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities that users find beneficial for security monitoring.
  • G2 users highlight that Imperva WAF offers superior application-layer controls, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for organizations needing detailed traffic management. F5 NGINX, while still effective, scores lower at 8.3, suggesting it may not provide the same level of granularity in application security.
  • Users on G2 report that the ease of use is a significant advantage for Imperva WAF, with a score of 9.4, making it more accessible for teams without extensive technical expertise. F5 NGINX, with a score of 8.4, may require a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Reviewers say that F5 NGINX's API and integrations score of 8.1 is a limitation for those looking for extensive third-party compatibility. In contrast, Imperva WAF shines with a score of 9.2, indicating a more flexible and integrative approach that users appreciate for enhancing their existing workflows.
  • Users report that while both products offer cloud deployment options, F5 NGINX scores 8.3, indicating a solid but not exceptional offering. Imperva WAF, however, is noted for its strong support for microservices development, scoring 9.2, which is particularly appealing for modern application architectures.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
F5 NGINX
NGINX Plus, Single Instance
Starting at $2500
per year
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
No pricing available
Free Trial
F5 NGINX
Free Trial is available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
96
9.5
36
Ease of Use
8.4
96
9.3
35
Ease of Setup
8.3
65
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.4
65
9.1
17
Quality of Support
7.6
70
9.0
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
45
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
93
9.3
33
Features by Category
Web Application Firewall (WAF)Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
8.7
22
9.2
33
Analysis
9.4
21
9.3
28
8.9
20
8.9
28
9.1
20
9.3
29
Controls
8.4
21
9.2
26
9.0
21
9.0
29
8.3
20
9.3
30
Functionality
8.2
18
9.1
26
8.1
21
9.2
28
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
Management
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Protection
8.1
21
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
Resolution
7.1
23
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Web Server AcceleratorHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.4
9
Not enough data
Data Management
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
User Features
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Modernization
8.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
F5 NGINX and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
18.9%
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
38.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.6%
Reviewers' Industry
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX
Information Technology and Services
38.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Internet
7.5%
Retail
2.8%
E-Learning
2.8%
Other
31.1%
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Information Technology and Services
38.5%
Retail
12.8%
Banking
10.3%
Financial Services
5.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.1%
Other
28.2%
Alternatives
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Add Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway
Add Azure Application Gateway
Traefik
Traefik
Add Traefik
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) Alternatives
FortiAppSec Cloud
FortiAppSec Cloud
Add FortiAppSec Cloud
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Add Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Add AWS WAF
Discussions
F5 NGINX
F5 NGINX Discussions
Improve the delivery of static resources
3 Comments
Mahuri B.
MB
Application serverRead more
Can I use nginx for free?
1 Comment
Monty the Mongoose crying
F5 NGINX has no more discussions with answers
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) Discussions
Is imperva a Web application firewall?
1 Comment
VM
Yes, Imperva is a well-known provider of web application firewall (WAF) solutions. Imperva offers a Web Application Firewall product, known as Imperva WAF,...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no more discussions with answers