Users report that HAProxy excels in performance and reliability, achieving a score of 9.6, while F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, although strong, scores slightly lower in this area, indicating that HAProxy may handle high traffic loads more efficiently.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy's open-source nature allows for extensive customization and flexibility, which is a significant advantage for developers looking to tailor their solutions, whereas F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, while feature-rich, may not offer the same level of customization due to its proprietary nature.
G2 users highlight that F5 Distributed Cloud WAF has superior quality of support, scoring 9.3 compared to HAProxy's 9.0, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful customer service with F5.
Users on G2 report that HAProxy's API and integrations score highly at 9.1, making it easier to connect with other tools and services, while F5's API management features, although robust, do not match the same level of user satisfaction.
Reviewers say that HAProxy's logging and reporting features score 8.7, which is beneficial for monitoring and troubleshooting, while F5 Distributed Cloud WAF's logging capabilities are perceived as less intuitive, leading to a score of 8.2.
Users say that F5 Distributed Cloud WAF shines in website protection, scoring 9.3, which indicates a strong focus on safeguarding web applications, while HAProxy's DNS protection is noted to be weaker, with a score of 7.9, suggesting potential vulnerabilities in that area.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.