# F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Progress Kemp LoadMaster Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that Progress Kemp LoadMaster excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager. Users appreciate its **easy-to-use web UI** and the availability of templates for various applications, which simplifies the setup process.
- **Users say** that Progress Kemp LoadMaster offers a robust feature set, including **layer-4/7 load balancing** , **SSL/TLS offloading** , and **content switching**. This versatility is highlighted by recent feedback praising its **flexible deployment options** and smooth upgrades, even in high availability configurations.
- **According to verified reviews** , F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is recognized for its strong **product understanding and innovative features**. However, it faces challenges in user satisfaction, as reflected in its lower G2 score and fewer recent reviews, indicating less current user engagement.
- **Reviewers mention** that Progress Kemp LoadMaster provides excellent support, with a high quality rating that users find reassuring. They note that the product is **rock solid in performance** and that support is readily available when needed, enhancing the overall user experience.
- **Users highlight** that while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager offers various load balancing methods and configuration options, it may not be as intuitive as Progress Kemp LoadMaster. Some users have pointed out that the learning curve can be steeper, which may affect day-to-day usability.
- **G2 reviewers indicate** that both products meet user requirements effectively, but Progress Kemp LoadMaster stands out with its higher ratings in ease of use and administration. Users appreciate its **informational reporting** and the ability to manage deployments easily, making it a preferred choice for many.



| | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.5 out of 5 | 4.7 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 39 | 213 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (70.0% of reviews) | Mid-Market (51.3% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Pros:
- Configuration Ease (1 reviews)
- Features (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Debugging Issues (1 reviews)
- Difficult Setup (1 reviews)

### Progress Kemp LoadMaster

Pros:
- Customer Support (27 reviews)
- Ease of Use (26 reviews)

Cons:
- GUI Improvements (11 reviews)
- Complex Configuration (9 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 9.2 (20 reviews) | 9.2 (151 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 9.0 (21 reviews) | 9.1 (151 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.8 (16 reviews) | 8.9 (143 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.8 (15 reviews) | 9.2 (131 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.6 (19 reviews) | 9.2 (143 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.9 (15 reviews) | 9.4 (141 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 9.4 (19 reviews) | 9.3 (142 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### Progress Kemp LoadMaster

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Load Balancing

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** | N/A | N/A |
| **Progress Kemp LoadMaster** | 8.3/10 | 47 |

#### Usability - Load Balancing

| Feature | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
| **User Interface Design** | Not enough data | 8.4 (45 reviews) | 
| **Setup Simplicity** | Not enough data | 8.7 (44 reviews) | 
| **Platform Integration** | Not enough data | 7.9 (41 reviews) | 
| **Container Support** | Not enough data | 7.4 (41 reviews) | 

#### Performance Optimization - Load Balancing

| Feature | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
| **Global Load Balancing** | Not enough data | 8.7 (39 reviews) | 
| **Dynamic Resource Allocation** | Not enough data | 8.3 (41 reviews) | 
| **Server Health Monitoring** | Not enough data | 8.5 (40 reviews) | 
| **Disaster Recovery** | Not enough data | 8.4 (38 reviews) | 

#### Security &amp; Compliance - Load Balancing

| Feature | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
| **SSL/TLS Termination** | Not enough data | 8.9 (41 reviews) | 
| **Application Firewall Integration** | Not enough data | 7.9 (39 reviews) | 
| **DDoS Mitigation** | Not enough data | 7.9 (40 reviews) | 
| **Access Control** | Not enough data | 8.3 (40 reviews) | 
| **IP Whitelisting/Blacklisting** | Not enough data | 8.0 (39 reviews) | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Load Balancing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing)




---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Progress Kemp LoadMaster | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 10.0% | 10.2% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 20.0% | 51.3% | 
| **Enterprise** | 70.0% | 38.6% | 

### By Industry

#### F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

- **Information Technology and Services:** 23.3%
- **Banking:** 16.7%
- **Financial Services:** 10.0%
- **Telecommunications:** 6.7%
- **Computer &amp; Network Security:** 6.7%
- **Security and Investigations:** 3.3%
- **Primary/Secondary Education:** 3.3%
- **Internet:** 3.3%
- **Information Services:** 3.3%
- **Hospitality:** 3.3%
- **Other:** 20.0%

#### Progress Kemp LoadMaster

- **Information Technology and Services:** 11.7%
- **Financial Services:** 7.1%
- **Hospital &amp; Health Care:** 7.1%
- **Computer &amp; Network Security:** 4.6%
- **Government Administration:** 4.1%
- **Education Management:** 3.6%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 3.6%
- **Insurance:** 3.6%
- **Legal Services:** 3.6%
- **Manufacturing:** 3.0%
- **Other:** 48.2%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

- [Azure Application Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-application-gateway/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (160 reviews)
- [Azure Traffic Manager](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-traffic-manager/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (18 reviews)
- [NetScaler](https://www.g2.com/products/netscaler/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (85 reviews)
- [HAProxy](https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (900 reviews)
- [Cloudflare Application Security and Performance](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (601 reviews)
- [Hostwinds](https://www.g2.com/products/hostwinds/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (438 reviews)
- [Akamai Cloud Computing](https://www.g2.com/products/akamai-cloud-computing/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (406 reviews)
- [Google Cloud Load Balancing](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-load-balancing/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (27 reviews)
- [AWS Elastic Load Balancing](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-elastic-load-balancing/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (96 reviews)
- [Barracuda Load Balancer ADC](https://www.g2.com/products/barracuda-load-balancer-adc/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (12 reviews)

### Alternatives to Progress Kemp LoadMaster

- [HAProxy](https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (900 reviews)
- [F5 NGINX](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (107 reviews)
- [Traefik](https://www.g2.com/products/traefik/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (35 reviews)
- [NetScaler](https://www.g2.com/products/netscaler/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (85 reviews)
- [Azure Application Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-application-gateway/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (160 reviews)
- [Cloudflare Application Security and Performance](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (601 reviews)
- [Hostwinds](https://www.g2.com/products/hostwinds/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (438 reviews)
- [Akamai Cloud Computing](https://www.g2.com/products/akamai-cloud-computing/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (406 reviews)
- [Varnish Software](https://www.g2.com/products/varnish-software/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (100 reviews)
- [AWS Elastic Load Balancing](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-elastic-load-balancing/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (96 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

No discussions available for this product.

### Progress Kemp LoadMaster

- Title: [Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/33506-can-kemp-integrate-with-automation-scripts) — 2 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Hi John,

The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands.  From..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm-vs-progress-kemp-loadmaster)

