Compare F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Progress Kemp LoadMaster 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Star Rating
(39)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Star Rating
(214)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Progress Kemp LoadMasterSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Progress Kemp LoadMaster excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager. Users appreciate its easy-to-use web UI and the availability of templates for various applications, which simplifies the setup process.
- Users say that Progress Kemp LoadMaster offers a robust feature set, including layer-4/7 load balancing, SSL/TLS offloading, and content switching. This versatility is highlighted by recent feedback praising its flexible deployment options and smooth upgrades, even in high availability configurations.
- According to verified reviews, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is recognized for its strong product understanding and innovative features. However, it faces challenges in user satisfaction, as reflected in its lower G2 score and fewer recent reviews, indicating less current user engagement.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Kemp LoadMaster provides excellent support, with a high quality rating that users find reassuring. They note that the product is rock solid in performance and that support is readily available when needed, enhancing the overall user experience.
- Users highlight that while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager offers various load balancing methods and configuration options, it may not be as intuitive as Progress Kemp LoadMaster. Some users have pointed out that the learning curve can be steeper, which may affect day-to-day usability.
- G2 reviewers indicate that both products meet user requirements effectively, but Progress Kemp LoadMaster stands out with its higher ratings in ease of use and administration. Users appreciate its informational reporting and the ability to manage deployments easily, making it a preferred choice for many.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
No pricing availableProgress Kemp LoadMaster
No pricing availableFree Trial
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
No trial information availableProgress Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
20
9.2
152
Ease of Use
9.0
21
9.1
152
Ease of Setup
8.8
16
8.9
144
Ease of Admin
8.8
15
9.2
132
Quality of Support
8.6
19
9.2
144
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
15
9.4
142
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
19
9.2
143
Features by Category
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.4
45
Not enough data
8.7
44
Not enough data
7.9
41
Not enough data
7.4
41
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.5
40
Not enough data
8.4
38
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.9
41
Not enough data
7.9
39
Not enough data
7.9
40
Not enough data
8.3
40
Not enough data
8.0
39
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Progress Kemp LoadMaster are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has no unique categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Banking
16.7%
Financial Services
10.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Computer & Network Security
6.7%
Other
36.7%
Information Technology and Services
11.6%
Financial Services
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.1%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Government Administration
4.0%
Other
65.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has no discussions with answers
Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?
2 Comments
NS
Hi John,
The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands. From...Read more
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
