Compare F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and HAProxy 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
FREE Open Source
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Star Rating
(39)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)HAProxy
Star Rating
(825)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
FREE Open Source
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that HAProxy excels in stability and reliability, with users highlighting its seamless integration into OpenShift as the default ingress controller. Many appreciate its performance under high load, describing it as a solution they can "set and forget."
- Users say that F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers a robust set of features for load balancing, particularly in enterprise environments. Reviewers mention its ability to manage virtual IPs and SSL configurations effectively, which is crucial for complex backend applications.
- According to verified reviews, HAProxy has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting a more positive user experience. Users frequently commend its straightforward configuration process, which allows for easy routing and TLS termination.
- Reviewers mention that while F5 BIG-IP LTM provides a comprehensive feature set, some users find it less intuitive compared to HAProxy. This can lead to a steeper learning curve, especially for teams that are new to application delivery controllers.
- G2 reviewers highlight that HAProxy's open-source model makes it an attractive option for mid-market companies, allowing them to leverage powerful load balancing capabilities without the associated costs of proprietary solutions like F5 BIG-IP LTM.
- Users report that both products meet their requirements effectively, but HAProxy's higher volume of recent reviews suggests a more active user community, which can be beneficial for support and shared knowledge among users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
No pricing availableFree Trial
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
No trial information availableHAProxy
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
20
9.2
475
Ease of Use
9.0
21
8.7
762
Ease of Setup
8.8
16
8.6
717
Ease of Admin
8.8
15
8.6
354
Quality of Support
8.6
19
9.1
360
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
15
9.1
276
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
19
9.1
492
Features by Category
Analysis
Not enough data
8.4
75
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Controls
Not enough data
9.0
68
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
9.0
77
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.9
69
Not enough data
7.7
31
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
58
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
8.9
19
Protection
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Resolution
Not enough data
8.9
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
57
Not enough data
7.6
39
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.3
129
Not enough data
8.1
186
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
8.6
149
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
115
Not enough data
8.7
125
Not enough data
8.6
119
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
9.2
124
Not enough data
8.3
107
Not enough data
8.3
106
Not enough data
8.4
108
Not enough data
8.8
108
Traffic Management & Performance - AI Gateways
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Governance & Observability - AI Gateways
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
API Management
Not enough data
9.1
83
Not enough data
8.8
85
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
7.9
71
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Data Integration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
75
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and HAProxy are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has no unique categories
HAProxy is categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS Protection, Container Networking, API Management, Bot Detection and Mitigation, and AI Gateways
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
HAProxy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Banking
16.7%
Financial Services
10.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Computer & Network Security
6.7%
Other
36.7%
Information Technology and Services
13.2%
Computer Software
10.3%
Financial Services
9.7%
Computer & Network Security
6.4%
Telecommunications
4.9%
Other
55.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has no discussions with answers
Is HAProxy an API gateway?
2 Comments
JL
Yes it can beRead more
Is HAProxy a reverse proxy?
2 Comments
EV
Yes, it's a reverse proxy. Actually it's one of the best reverse proxies out there.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
