Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Exabeam New-Scale Fusion and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
EventSentry
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Domain and IP Intelligence Feeds
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intezer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Sales
No pricing available
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion
Star Rating
(13)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Sales
Browse all 3 pricing plansPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Star Rating
(27)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Exabeam Security Management Platform excels in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.6, making it particularly user-friendly for organizations looking to implement security solutions quickly. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.2 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Exabeam shines in Data Context with a score of 9.7, providing comprehensive insights that help security teams understand threats better. Users on G2 note that this feature significantly enhances their incident response capabilities compared to Cortex XSOAR, which scored 8.0 in Vulnerability Assessment.
- G2 users highlight that Exabeam's Automated Remediation feature, scoring 8.9, allows for efficient incident handling, whereas Cortex XSOAR's score of 8.7 indicates it may not be as robust in this area, leading to potential delays in response times.
- Reviewers say that Exabeam's Behavioral Analysis feature, with a score of 9.4, is particularly effective in identifying unusual patterns, which is crucial for proactive threat detection. In comparison, Cortex XSOAR's capabilities in this area are not as highly rated, which may affect its overall effectiveness in real-time threat management.
- Users report that Exabeam's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, which some users find lacking compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which has a higher score of 8.8. This difference may influence user satisfaction and the overall experience when seeking assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Exabeam's Product Direction is rated a perfect 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development and enhancements. In contrast, Cortex XSOAR's score of 9.0 suggests that while it is also viewed positively, there may be some concerns about its long-term roadmap.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion
Threat Hunter
Contact Sales
Point and click search for efficient threat hunting
- Threat Hunt using MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques.
- Security alert ID-based search
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
No pricing availableFree Trial
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion
Free Trial is available
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
11
8.9
19
Ease of Use
9.2
11
8.7
21
Ease of Setup
9.6
8
8.9
18
Ease of Admin
8.8
8
8.8
15
Quality of Support
8.0
11
8.4
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
8
9.0
16
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
11
8.8
20
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Detection
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Information
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Threat Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network Management
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
Incident Management
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Security Intelligence
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.8
12
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.1
12
Orchestration
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
9.0
12
Response
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are categorized as Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion is categorized as User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), and Insider Threat Management (ITM)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is categorized as Threat Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
15.4%
Semiconductors
7.7%
Security and Investigations
7.7%
Real Estate
7.7%
Online Media
7.7%
Other
53.8%
Computer & Network Security
37.0%
Manufacturing
7.4%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
Events Services
7.4%
Consulting
3.7%
Other
37.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are three characteristics of SIEM?
1 Comment
FM
Data Collection: SIEM systems collect data from a variety of sources, including network devices, servers, applications, and endpoints. This data is typically...Read more
What are the components of SIEM?
1 Comment
FM
1- Data collection
2- Log Management
3- Event correlation
4- Threats detection
5- Alerting and reporting Read more
Exabeam New-Scale Fusion has no more discussions with answers
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
